My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 04/18/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 04/18/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:32:00 PM
Creation date
4/17/2006 3:24:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
04/18/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
work, it would be helpful to establish some projections on the estimated annual cost for this <br />work. Stafftherefore recommends that it be directed to prepare an estimate of the cost for future <br />street reconstruction prior to establishing an assessment policy. In the interim staff would <br />recommend that the Committee recommend to City Council that street reconstruction associated <br />with the installation of sewer and water be fully assessed as an element of the utility installation. <br />Finally, staff recommends that the redevelopment of Now and Then Estates be reconsidered in <br />August 2006 after Oakwood has had an opportunity to formalize their agreements with interested <br />property owners. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig asked if there are other streets in the City that may need to be labeled for this <br />type of street reconstruction. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler replied 160th Avenue has one of the worst street conditions in the City. He <br />noted staff rates the condition of the City's roads yearly. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec commented the key is the policy, rather than the areas. He noted the large cost <br />residents would incur from a total reconstruction project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson indicated she has difficulty with the idea of assessing 100% for a <br />reconstruction, when within that year the City might have paid 50% on an overlay. <br /> <br />The Committee discussed possible costs of street reconstruction projects and how assessments <br />could be determined. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler suggested the amount of assessment could include a factor of whether the road <br />has gone through its projected life. The roads that fail prematurely could be handled differently <br />as far as the cost of reconstruction. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig requested further input regarding staff's recommendation. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated other cities seem to be comfortable assessing in the range of <br />$5,000 to $7,000. He suggested tailoring the assessment policy to fall in that range. He noted <br />occasionally there are huge lots with the potential to be subdivided, and th/s issue has been raised <br />by many residents at public hearings. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted at one time the policy stated that a lot with large acreage could be assessed <br />four times, since it could be subdivided. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that policy has not been followed since 1990. He noted it was <br />the policy when a lot of the City's streets were being paved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig suggested a timefi-ame be applied, such as a charge being applied to a <br />property that is split within a certain number of years of the street reconstruction. <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson concurred. She noted in the past Ramsey has been a rural community and <br />people have had large acreages to live on. However, now more and more of the time property is <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / March 21, 2006 <br /> Page 7 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.