My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:02:28 PM
Creation date
4/21/2006 2:37:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/25/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Trudgeon asked how the Planning Commission would handle <br />a scenario where the owner had forty acres, and was developing twenty acres and keeping twenty <br />acres for their home. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Johnson stated that if they were using all forty acres for development, they <br />could not keep twenty acres for one lot. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated that the question is if this is creating new <br />lots. He indicated that the argument is that these lots exist, they just are not going to be quite as <br />they were. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy indicated that the other question is if this is one development or two. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Johnson stated it is two development sharing a common septic system. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated he can see the rationale, but is not sure it fits the ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated that the ordinance says there has to be a common septic system. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Johnson added that he is not sure it says specifically that there has to be one for <br />each development. <br /> <br />The Plarming Commission had further discussion on the requirements and the guidelines of the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Comn~issioner Van Scoy asked who has responsibility for possible septic failure. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated that there is escrow, and it would be the <br />responsibility of the management company. He indicated that if they have not been collecting <br />dues properly they would be writing a big check. He stated that Connexus Energy is one <br />company that does this. <br /> <br />Motion by Vice Chairperson Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Shepherd to recommend that <br />the City Council grant approval of preliminary plat request for Kelly Acres, contingent upon <br />compliance with the City Staff Review letter dated February 28, 2006, and the following <br />additional contingencies: <br />,, Approval from MPCA on the common septic system. <br />· Resolution of the lot size issues for the existing home. <br />· Completion of the traffic study. <br />· Reconsideration by the City Council of the cluster ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer indicated that in terms of the existing ordinance, he does not see the same <br />issues as the last case. He stated that as much as he opposes the density, under the Planning <br />Commission's charge he believes they almost have to recommend approval. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/March 2, 2006 <br /> Page 25 of 31 <br /> -39- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.