Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Zimmerman replied that if the license is granted, it would be <br />under certain conditions and violation of those conditions would result in <br />the license being revoked. <br />Tim Klingheil - Inquired how a 35' x AS' structure could be built without <br />a building permit; that such a structure and odora from the bears affects <br />adjacent property values. <br />Carlton Anderson - 6331 153rd Lane N.W. - Inquired if Mr. Guyot has <br />submitted the necessary information required for a wild animal license. <br />The placement of the enclosure does not meet specifications listed in the <br />wild animal ordinance; granting a variance would set a precedence. <br />Katbleen Anderson - 6331 153rd Lane K.W. - Inquired if citizens will be <br />allowed anymore input into this case beyond this public hearing. <br /> Chairman Zi~merman replied that the Planning Commission will be making a <br /> recommendation to City Council, taking into consideration public comments. <br /> Mr. Guyot explained that the primary enclosure consists of a 3-sided, 35' x <br /> 45' cement block wall structure with the Ach side consisting of chain link <br /> fencing; the secondary enclosure is an electrical fence loopin§ around the <br /> chain link side of the primary enclosure; there is a shelter area within <br /> the block building for the bear. <br /> Bill Wahl - 15&03 Sunfish Lake Blvd. - Stated he lives directly across the <br /> street from Mr. Guyer; that the bears are securely caged and he doesn't see <br /> them as a threat; that without prior notice, he has visited the property <br /> and never witnessed produce scraps lying about nor detected any bad odors. <br /> Kathleem Anderson - Stated that the bea~ is allowed outside of the primary <br /> enclosure and doesn't feel secure with,'an electrical fence, that is not <br /> very high off the ground, being allowed as the secondary enclosure. <br /> Mr. guyer explained that beekeepers use the same 3-strand electrical fence <br /> to keep hears out and it is just as effective for keeping bears in; the <br /> bears are only allowed out of the primary enclosure under his supervision. <br /> Mr. Carlton Anderson - Noted that according to the ordimance, the seoondary <br /> enclosure should entirely surround the primary enclosure. <br /> Chairman Zi=merman noted receipt of the following written comments <br /> regarding Mr. Guyer's request: <br /> <br /> }~ry Westpbal - 6355 154th Lane N.W. - Opposing Mr. ~uyer's repuest. <br /> Jeff Wiles - 8453 176th Lame K.W. - In favor of Mr. Guyer'$ request. <br /> Kathleem Anderson - 6331 153rd Lane - Opposing Mr. Guyer's request. <br /> <br /> Jerry Martin - 6614 153rd Lane N.W. - Inquired as to Mr. Guyer's reason for <br /> wanting to keep bears on his property. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cuyer replied that he keeps bears for his personal enjoyment and not <br /> Planning & Zoning Public Hearing/February 2, lpg8 <br /> <br />Page 2 cf 3 <br /> <br /> <br />