Agenda - Council - 05/09/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~cn.~m.unit~ ~cwvl~pm~n~D~r~ct~r~Trud~¢~n~stat¢dC~nguh~v~ire~es~h`~ubr~e~o~a~n:` requesting pe~/ssion to cons~ct a 120 foot monopole comm~cadons tower. Ci~ Code allows for a m~imm height of 120 feet for comm~catiom towers located ~ residenti~ dis~c~. ~e applic~t has also submiaed plus sho~g ~e location of~e proposed tower ~d accessow building se~ing ~e tower on ~e prope~. CiW Code req~es a 180 foot setback from prope~y lines; ~ ~s c~e ~e site pl~ identifies a setback of 195 feet. ~. Tmdgeon explained CiW Code states ~at no new tower shall be approved ~ess equipment plied for ~e proposed tower c~ot be acco~odated::;on ~ exis~g tower or bufldmg.w~m a 1-mile md~ of ~e proposed tower. Ci~.~:~rds do not show ~y commumcaUons tower located ~m one mile of ~e proposed..~:~.~e applicant h~ provided · e City info~atlon reg~ding o~er towers ~ ~e ~ea ~d a q0vemg~ap sho~ng ~e need for · e tower on ~e subject prope~. Mr. Tmdgeon advise~ f~[~i~ ~s~tor would like to have ~is issue looked at closer ,~.~... Ci[~ A~nis~ator No~ stated oram~ce o ye~s a~o. ~t was recognized a site nuis~ce, md if~e public h~ to put up ~ should benifit ~ ~e fo~ of t~es, ra~er ~ p~vate prope~ o~ers benefiting '~J~'~expense of neighbors. S~ feels ·ere may be holes ~ ~e present ordinance, ~d ~at it is ~y of discmsion. If ~e Co~cil would like to discuss mis issue at a work:~:~?~ me pe~it re~'~t shoed be tabled. C~c~emb~r Elv~g co--outed he wodI~, ha~:?]~t~t ti~:~ saying ~e best ~d most effective use o~ ~s l~d wo~d include a cha~li~: fen~'-:~6~d~a pole y Gmec noted:~ere was ~}~pphcaUon location ~at w~ da~e~at one ~f~e, ~d it ~ed,out ~at comply w~ able to locate on ~other tower. He ~nd~cated he wo~d be ~nterestedqn discmsing ~s issue ~er. He noted some of what is~happe~n~::i~'~ff~'":i~b'~es. ~e..p'~a~g up ~eir towers became of ~d renting s~j~e pole~ht to othe~*~ies He noted when ~is w~ disc~t~ p~t mez~h~d ~ed tS'ka'~?~e p6~{~l::gn public prope~ where it could benefit ~I of~e citizens Motion by'~cilmember '~:~6k, seconded by Co~cilmember S~ommen, to table ~e request for a conditionaf:~e pe~it for a monopole co~cations tower; C~e of Cin~l~ Wireless, Inc., to a work s~'~On for Furor disc~sion: ~'~m~i~ Development Director Tmd~eon indicated ~e ~e~me for · is application ~11 likely need to be extended 60 days. It will be included on ~e a~enda of a ~e work session a~enda. Co~cilmember Je~ey suggested staff obtain i~o~ation ~om other comm~ities ~at ha~e gone ~ough a Tower Ordin~ce review in ~e last couple of y~ars. Commu~ Development Director Tmd~eon replied ~is topic is ve~ heavily regulated ~ovemed, ~d ~ere ~e good resources available. Mayor Gmec noted the Ci~ went ~ou~h quite ~ exte~ive proem wi~ ~e o~al ~ting of ~e ordin~ce. Co~cilmember Elvig the expansion of~e Ci~'s i~astmc~e. Ci~ Adminis~ator No,an replied ~ere is c~ently City Council/April 25, 2006 -220- Page 11 of 23