|
existing drainage area. A revised site plan has been requested that indicates an easement in these
<br /> ends approval of the site plan contingent upo.n
<br /> ...... acIvisec[ staff recomm ..... '-~d :A'~'41 2I; 2006~ and' the
<br /> areas.. Nll2z Lruo. ge.o~/ _..1 l~tte'r ated March 28, 2000, rcv~r
<br /> compliance with City Staff R=v,ew ...... d
<br /> Developer entering into a TiT Agreement.
<br /> Counciimember Elvig inquired about the back portion of the building being leased out, as there
<br /> is no access in this area.
<br /> re lied the applicant has !~icated the back portion
<br /> " ...... i*', Develonment Director Trudgeon .P ...... '~-e leasi~¢'i~:'out- It would likely be
<br /> builam~ curren ~ ~. ~ '
<br /> ~omm~, y.. ~ ti" will not be used, and ~ey vml ~nlJ~,,~ ~.~},? *
<br /> of tile ~ . ......... .
<br /> d for a warehouse or s~m,~u~ ~ ,~???
<br /> __zm-, the leasing arrangement.
<br /> · - · ' staffhas an concerns regmu.9'~
<br /> c ..... ~ember Elmg mqmred if Y .4~ ~. "~!}~.. .
<br /> ......... '~¢~:~a:a,- - ,'-~d;'~;~s the full building
<br /> · re lied ~ther ~e appnum~ ~e~ <.
<br /> ,~ ,:,_. nevelo,,ment D~rector Trudgeon P. '~:'" '-~- ~-e zonint, c0d~?:and there must
<br />
<br /> ~-~ o~e~uate mining circulation. *' '-:k.~:~ .... i~..~u.~ .>:'
<br /> ut, a,.* ~_ b,~:, ~' ' . ·
<br /> - ,' '?~'~t the sunken area aeplcteu
<br /> ~ ., ---~-o. mvio suaeested staff inform PP. .~_'~::2'..'+.,, ,-hen it is windy.
<br /> . - ,. __.,- .,orthwest ~/lll tilt w~u~ ,~ ..~
<br /> site plan g '<h;:~::~...:... .:~.~::.~,..~,, ......
<br /> '~"::kf~:}~r,,,,,,,dlmembei-::~arson, to gram .apDuvm
<br /> otion by Counciimember Jeffrey, secon?~ u.g:~, o£~tone ~nstrucfion, contingent upon
<br /> ~e proposed site plan of Riverside Manumc ..v~z~...ng; ~,'....: .........
<br /> · · StaffReview Letter ddaIM?h 28',',2~6;'¥evised April 21, 2006.
<br /> compliance vath City ..:~
<br /> .~,. >. :>t-:!:i:! ~ Jeffrey, pearson, Cook, Elvig,
<br /> Motioitcarried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councllmembers
<br /> '<{5i}¢51'.. ~}{~il UseEeri~lit for a lviouopm~ ,-~
<br /> se #6: Request for a .~on ~;
<br />~ Ca ...:=,,'.--.'..- . -- '"fi-~moulai: ~¢i;~i~'ss, Inc.
<br /> <~.+'~ ..... <'%}".:~}:;. "~5~i% ...... ,dyed an avplication from
<br /> ,.:5" s~:¢~'.. "~":'>~" ; ted the city nas ~,,~ ..... .--
<br /> comm ty Devel°pmenCDaect°.r T age°n-sP t -ole communication tower, m, tena.?% !l2
<br /> .-,. ",' ;:':¢(~:-~esS to constiX/ct, anQ operate a mumq~ ' ...... r will be located at
<br /> cmgmar ~,..~..~ ~,.:. ..... v The nroposea tuw~ ... , ·
<br /> · '"'n[~tiM"s wireless phone netwm,.. ~- ~ "-e Rowe Towers are permitted m
<br /> ap tn ~1 gu : .. e and t.;aroim -
<br /> g '..-:': Wheal b Jeffr y ' ' t and are at least 10
<br /> Valley Road on!:.?p,erty % ..... located in the Tower Overlay D}sm . ·.. does not
<br /> residential districts!?~!ong ~s muy. ,~? ,--,*~d ,,,itkin the Tower Ovenay vlsmct u,~, . .
<br /> acres in size. The subject propeny ~s tuu. - part of the Valley
<br /> meet the minimm lot siie of 10 acres· The subject property is approximately 9.27 acres m size.
<br /> _., ×nlak{~d the minimum lot s,ze m the ar~a~ ls.,t,e~no~a~c acres. The original
<br /> M~. T,~dgeon e,_~ = -- onna four lots were createu, ,-,
<br /> View Estates prat approveu m ..... - . wed to be created as a remnant parcel per City
<br /> parcel was 38.7 acres and the developer received a variance for Lots 1-3 for lot size and lot
<br /> a th ubiect roperty, was allo. ~ = .~o c' tv reauested an ad&tmnal
<br /> width. Lot -, e s . P _ - , ~,~was creareu, u,~.~oun-~ . is
<br /> Ordinances. It should be noted mat when ou[ -,' '
<br /> 27 feet of right-of-way to be dedicated for Oreen Valley Road (CR 63)· If the right-of-way
<br /> 'included,'Lot ~Ss approximately 10.3 acres. OnApfil 6,'~006':~te'B°ard °~ Adjusxmen~ graf/ted
<br /> a variance to the 10 acre lot size requirement based on the platting history of the property.
<br />
<br />City Council / April 25, 2006
<br />Page 10 of 23
<br />
<br />-219-
<br />
<br />
<br />
|