Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />May 3, 1988 <br /> <br />The comment that the use of high capacity wells installed by the <br />city will lower watertables or draw contaminates into the ground <br />water is not applicable to this area. That statement was made to <br />caution the city from installing high capacity wells (1,000 to <br />2,000 gallons per minute) in the vicinity of the landfill. <br />Currently, the city wells are low capacity (500 gallons per minute) <br />and are located approximately two miles from the landfill. At the <br />time of the installation of the wells, a study was made to <br />determine the radius of influence of the wells. That study <br />concluded that the radius of influence 'of the proposed well was <br />1,230 feet. In addition, the city wells are located in the Ironton <br />and Galesville Sandstone approximately 300 feet below the ground <br />surface and are separated from the surficial ground water by <br />several confinin~ layers. Therefore, based on the radius of <br />influence and the exissing confining layers, it was concluded that <br />contamination of the City wells from the landfill was very remote. <br />A greater concern as expressed by the Minnesota Pollution Control <br />Agency and the Metropolitan Council is the development of high to <br />moderate density residential subdivisions (less than one unit per <br />10 acres). With the influx of private wells in the higher ground <br />water bearing formations, the potential of drawing contaminates <br />into the ~round water is increased. Without municipal sanitary <br />sewer and water, these developments rely cn Ch-site wastewater <br />disposal systems which provide a source for ground water pollution. <br /> In review of the use of sanitary sewer capacity by outlot A, Rum <br /> Acres Estates, service to the area will not prohibit the <br /> development of other areas in the city with sewer and water. It <br /> kas be~n the City's policy to allow development of subdivisions <br /> with sewer and water provided they are consistent with the <br /> Comprehensive Plans and the developers are willing to pay for the <br /> e×t~nsions of the utilities through undeveloped areas. In the <br /> future, if other areas are outside of the Urban Service Area and <br /> are ready to develop, areas within the Urban Service Area that are <br /> not being developed can be traded for those areas. This practice <br /> has been used in many cities inc!u~ing the City of Ramsey. <br /> The Metropolitan Council also encourages the development of the <br /> Urban Service Area by the city of Ramsey. This development will <br /> help the ~.W.C.C. pay for facilities that have Deen previously <br /> built. The Metropolitan Council has also stated that they would be <br /> more receptive to expanding the city's Urban Service Area if they <br /> control the growth of the Rural Se-~'ice Area by limiting <br /> development to one lot per !0 acres. <br /> <br /> <br />