Laserfiche WebLink
The C~mdssion reviewed the proposed conditional use permit and considered <br /> amending it to restrict the garage height to 16 feet. <br /> Discussion ensued ~egarding the option for Mr. Erikson to subdivide his <br /> property between the hc~e and the new garage; the lot containing the home <br /> would continue to be zoned B-1 but be regulated by it's principal use, <br /> Residential; the lot containing the garage would retain the B-1 zoning and <br /> the garage would not have to be reduoed in height. <br /> Mr. Erikson requested that the Commission table action on his request for a <br /> conditional use permit to allow him more time to study outions available to <br /> him. <br /> Motion by Commissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Holm that upon <br /> request of the applicant, action on Mr. Jeff Erikson's request for a <br /> conditional use permit is tabled. <br /> Further Discussion: Commissioners Howell and Shumway were opposed to <br /> tabling and prolonging the case. <br /> Commissioner Holm withdrew his second to table Mr. Erikson's case. <br /> Chairman Zimmerman seconded the motion to table Mr. Erikson's case. <br /> Amendment by Commissioner Howell and seconded by Commissioner Holm to <br /> request that the City Attorney submit a written opinion regarding Mr. <br /> Erikson' s situation. <br /> <br />· Amendment carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zia~erman, Commissioners Terry, <br /> Shtm~ay, Holm, Howell and r~ue. voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner <br /> Hendriksen. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chainnan Zinmerman, Commissioners Terry, Holm <br /> and LaDue. Voting No: Commissioners Howell and Shumway. Absent: <br /> Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman noted that the City approved the attendance of two <br />Planning commissioners at the advanced planning institt~e in Rochester the <br />week of ~'~-rch 21. Commissioners H~e!l and Shumway were elected to attend <br />the s~_minar. <br /> <br />C~se ~10: Discussion R_~cardinc ~a~= kn~ Park <br />Commissioner Shum~'ay recalled t_hat per the Plarnning Com~.ission's request, <br />the Park Co~ission has revi~ed park dedication requirements. In order to <br />acquire only the amount of land necessary from the developer for park <br />dedication end not forfeit any cash that wo~ld have been due the City and <br />in order to not delay plats currently before the city, the Park Commission <br />is r~uesting that Planning and Zoning s .upport their recommendation that <br />City Council adopt an emergency ordinance to ~llow the city the ability to <br />require a combination of land and fee in lieu of the m~ximum ~-nount of land <br />Planning and Zoning Commission/F'~rch 17, 1988 <br /> <br />Page7 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />