Laserfiche WebLink
DISOJSS HIGP~4AY #10 CORRIDOR S~DDY <br />C~m~,~nity Develolmment Director Anne Norris <br /> <br />CASE #11: <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />As you recs/1, the final version of the Highway #10 Corridor Study was <br />presented and discussed on Februaq7 25, 1988. At that tiH~, the consultant <br />stressed the need to agree on and set goals for development in the study <br />area, to establish policies consistent with those goals and to assign <br />responsibility for achieving those goals. <br /> <br />For your information, enclosed is the impl~entation portion of the Highway <br />#10 Corridor Study. <br /> <br />(lbse~vations: <br /> <br />At its meeting on April 12, the Commission set a special meeting date of <br />April 27 to meet with the Economic Development Commission to review the <br />study. As you know, the April 27 discussion on the Highway ~10 Corridor <br />Study was tabled to another time. <br /> <br />Reconmaendation: <br /> <br />The Commission should schedule another meeting to discuss the Highway #10 <br />Corridor Study with the Economic Developnent Co~aission. <br /> <br />ConmLission Action: <br /> <br />Will be based on your discussion. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />Administrator <br />Attorney <br />~ngineer X <br />Co~munityDevelo~ment Director X <br /> <br />Chief of Police <br />Finance Officer <br />Public Works Superintendent <br />Other <br /> <br /> <br />