My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2023
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2023
>
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2026 11:47:27 AM
Creation date
8/8/2023 12:11:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/08/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
787
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 8. Describe any anticipated vegetation and topographic alterations outside the pit, <br />2 and reclamation plans consistent with the stated end use for the land; and <br />3 9. Existing and new nonmetallic mining operations must submit land reclamation <br />4 plans to the local government compatible with the purposes of this section. <br />5 e. River -dependent uses. River -dependent uses must comply with the following design <br />6 standards: <br />7 1. Structures and parking areas, except shoreline facilities and private roads and <br />8 conveyances serving river -dependent uses as provided in section 920(L) <br />9 (exemptions), must meet the dimensional and performance standards in this <br />10 section must be designed so that they are not readily visible, and must be <br />11 screened by establishing and maintaining natural vegetation; <br />12 2. Shoreline facilities must comply with Minnesota Rules, chapter 6115 and must: <br />13 (i) Be designed in a compact fashion so as to minimize the shoreline area <br />14 affected; and <br />15 (ii) Minimize the surface area of land occupied in relation to the number of <br />16 watercraft or barges to be served; and <br />17 3. Dredging and placement of dredged material are subject to existing federal and <br />18 state permit requirements and agreements. <br />19 f. Wireless communication towers. Wireless communication towers require a conditional 8f <br />20 interim use permit and are subject to the following additional design standards: <br />21 1. The applicant must demonstrate that functional coverage cannot be provided <br />22 through co -location, a tower at a lower height, or a tower at a location outside of the <br />23 M RCCA; <br />24 2. The tower must not be located in a bluff or shore impact zone; <br />25 3. Placement of the tower must minimize impacts on public river corridor views; a-t -d <br />26 II. Comply -with the general d-es+gn standards in section 117 148(h)(2) (general design <br />27 standards). <br />28 (F) Structure height and placement and lot size. <br />29 (1) Purpose. To establish standards that protect primary conservation areas and public river <br />30 corridor views from development impacts and ensure that new development is sited <br />31 consistent with the purpose of the MRCCA. <br />32 (2) Structure height. Structures and facilities must comply with the following standards unless <br />33 identified as exempt in section 920(L)): <br />34 a. Structures and facilities must comply with the following standards unless identified as <br />35 exempt in 920(L) : <br />36 1. ROS District: 35 feet. <br />37 2. RN District: 35 feet. <br />38 3. SR District: Height is determined by underlying zoning, provided the allowed <br />39 height is consistent with that of the mature treeline, where present, and existing <br />40 surrounding development, as viewed from the OWHL of the opposite shore. <br />41 b. Height is measured on the side of the structure facing the Mississippi River. <br />42 c. In addition to the conditional use permit requirements of section 920(C)(4), criteria for <br />43 considering whether to grant a conditional use permit for structures exceeding the <br />44 height limits must include: <br />45 1. Assessment of the visual impact of the proposed structure on public river corridor <br />46 views, including views from other communities; <br />47 2. Determination that the proposed structure meets the required bluff and OHWL <br />48 setbacks; <br />Page 105 of 160 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.