My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/01/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/01/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:39:44 AM
Creation date
5/26/2006 2:47:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/01/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The most"substantial setback deviation is the 20 foot minimum separation distance between <br />buildings in the R-2 District. This seems to be excessive in lieu of the fact that single family <br />homes can be constructed with a 12 foot separation and still meet City Code. The 20 foot <br />separation in the R-2 District was written with the larger, multiple-unit buildings in mind; it did <br />not anticipate the detached townhome style. From a fire safety standpoint, it is preferred to <br />obtain a minimum of 10 feet between buildings. The applicant has been requested to revise the <br />plat to this minimum distance between homes. <br /> <br />City Code discusses general and specific requirements for allowing zoning amendments to <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD). These criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />High Quality Desizn and Compatibility with Surroundin~ Land Uses <br /> <br />The proposed detached townhomes will include architectural elements resembling prairie-style <br />homes. They are proposing to meet the architectural standards required in the R-2 district. Staff is <br />recommending the use of varied colors among the units, to increase the street appeal of the <br />development. <br /> <br />The surrounding land uses are townhomes to the south and single family homes to the west. <br />While density transitioning will be required, it appears as though detached townhomes are a good <br />fit between the two land uses. <br /> <br />Provision of a Wider Ranae of Housina Types, Prices Ranaes. and Styles <br /> <br />The application is proposing to construct one-level, association-maintained living. This is a <br />newly emerging housing option targeted for primarily empty-nesters and seniors. The houses are <br />proposed to be prairie-style, and incorporate a variety of unique design elements. <br /> <br />Public Amenities and Open SCaces <br /> <br />Planned-Unit-Developments require 50% private or 20% public space. It appears as though the <br />proposal meets the 50% private open space requirement. The total impervious surface, at full <br />build-out, is .83 acres, which leaves 53% to open areas. <br /> <br />This development will provide another extension of the trail system in the City, providing a link <br />that will eventually connect trail from County Road 47 to Alpine Drive. <br /> <br />Preservation of Natural Amenities and Scenic Qualities <br /> <br />It does not appear that there are any significant natural amenities or scenic qualities to this site, <br />with the exception of its wooded characteristics. Efforts should be made to retain as many trees <br />as possible, especially throughout the density transition area. Staff recommends that, as part of <br />the PUD approval, the tree preservation plan is revised to preserve more trees as a natural <br />amenity and density transition. <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.