My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 03/16/1999 - Special Meeting
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 03/16/1999 - Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 2:16:14 PM
Creation date
5/29/2003 9:05:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special Meeting
Document Date
03/16/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
two to three. They raised a couple of possibilities such as an across-the-board increase to three, <br />holding the number to two and allowing a third dogs if certain performance standards are met, <br />holding the number to two in the urban district and increasing the number to three in rural large <br />lot areas. Staff was also advised to refer to dog regulations in Maple Grove and Fridley. <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Walther stated Staff researched, however, has not been able <br />to find any other existing dog regulations that include much more in the way of performance <br />standards than Ramsey's current ordinance. Therefore, with the basic ground rules akeady in <br />place, the next step was to add and clarify definitions, and make a determination on whether to <br />increase the number of dogs allowed without a special permit from the Council. <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Walther stated Staff dratted an ordinance that now includes a <br />definition for commercial dog kennel and private dog kennel; and clearly specifies the need for a <br />conditional use permit for these uses. Staff recommends the City either increase the number of <br />dogs allowed to be kept on a property to three, or retain the two dog restriction on parcels less <br />than 25,000 square feet in size. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Barry Childs, 6041 - 51st Lane NW, stated concern regarding enforcement. He asked if the <br />ordinance would also apply to cats. Community Development Assistant Walther stated currently <br />there are only restrictions for dogs, horses and certain farm animals. <br /> <br />Rick Christians, 7330 o 155th Avenue NW, suggested two dogs are sufficient per property. <br />Allowing more dogs may cause more problems with dogs running loose through the City. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Wivoda, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Anderson, Commissioners Wivoda, Kociscak, <br />Dempsey, Jensen, and Johnson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Nixt. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 8:20 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Chairperson Anderson called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order at <br />8:20 p.m. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed technical changes needed in the ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dempsey suggested the cost for a duplicate dog tag be increased to $10 in order to <br />compensate for processing. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/March 16, 1999 <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.