Laserfiche WebLink
Haviland Fields Development <br /> Finding of Facts and Record of Decision <br /> Agency Comment Response <br /> Permits The project proposer will apply for <br /> Any other work that affects MnDOT right of way will permits if additional work is done <br /> require an appropriate permit.All permits are that affects MnDOT right of way. <br /> available and should be submitted at: <br /> https:Holpa.dot.state.mn.us/0LPA/. Please upload <br /> this letter when applying for any permits. For <br /> questions regarding permit submittal requirements, <br /> please contact Buck Craig of MnDOT's Metro District <br /> Permits Section at 651-775-0405 (cell)or <br /> buck.craig@state.mn.us. <br /> Anoka County Traffic 1. Noted,this has been updated in <br /> 1. The north access to CSAH 5(Nowthen Blvd) does the traffic study.The team is <br /> not meet our access spacing guidelines for full (or willing to change the north <br /> secondary) access.We believe this should be a access to right in/right out. <br /> right in/right out only access with a NB CSAH 5 2. Noted.The proposer will review <br /> right turn lane. design options with the city and <br /> 2. The south access to CSAH 5 should have a county to determine the <br /> separate NB right turn lane to eliminate the lane appropriate site design. <br /> trap that currently exists.The NB right turn lane 3. Because January is not <br /> will need to be constructed to run alongside the historically one of the higher <br /> merge taper for the outermost NB thru lane. traffic months, peak hour <br /> 3. We have some issues with when the traffic counts volumes were looked at on the <br /> were done,as winter has lower volumes and study area roadways and <br /> January is not a good month to be using to compared to MnDOT Annual <br /> forecast data. Average Daily Traffic(AADT) <br /> 4. We would like to see an updated traffic model counts. PM peak hour volumes <br /> reflecting the RI/RO north access on CSAH 5 and were between 8%and 10%of <br /> the gated access connecting to Cobalt St that MnDOT AADT volumes, <br /> restricts traffic from entering and exiting this therefore it was assumed that <br /> access. the traffic volumes were <br /> reasonable,and no adjustments <br /> were made.Additionally,for the <br /> purposes of the EAW review,the <br /> unit count is 10%higher than <br /> the actual proposed project,so <br /> the traffic count is in line with <br /> the expected peak season <br /> volumes. <br /> 4. The traffic analysis for the build <br /> condition has been updated to <br /> reflect the two access changes <br /> and is included in the updated <br /> traffic study(Attachment B). <br /> Public Comments and Responses <br /> Name Comment Response <br /> Bandon Folta As a resident of Ramsey I am sick and tired of all the Comment noted. <br /> townhouses and apartments being put up in the city <br /> leave the city alone !! We are loosing the country <br /> feel!! <br /> David Drake I have looked at the info from Havilland Fields& Comment noted. Regarding the <br /> disagree with the report on page 28 to30,concerning site's generated traffic, it was <br /> the entrance into this new building from co. rd 5 estimated that the number of units <br /> 11 <br />