Laserfiche WebLink
Haviland Fields Development <br /> Finding of Facts and Record of Decision <br /> Name Comment Response <br /> (church property).The LOS data on traffic flow at A. should be estimated 10%higher <br /> This fine for 2023 but not for 2027.The LOS for the than the current design includes. <br /> latter date is also A,which I believe is a gross error. It <br /> should be either C or D. I currently live at Stoney River <br /> &see the actual traffic every AM& know that the real <br /> traffic loads as shown on the data report can't be <br /> correct. I request that more info be obtained at this <br /> intersection.Thank you. DD <br /> Alexandria St Dear Mr Larson Comment noted. <br /> John I am writing to express my vehement objection to the <br /> proposed development of the Lord of Life property in <br /> our community.As a concerned resident, I feel <br /> compelled to outline the potential devastating impact <br /> this development could have on our surrounding <br /> communities,families, and neighbors. <br /> First and foremost,the increase in traffic, landscape <br /> alterations,and population growth resulting from this <br /> development will undoubtedly disrupt the peaceful <br /> and safe environment that we currently enjoy.The <br /> influx of additional vehicles will lead to congestion, <br /> making it harder for residents to commute and risking <br /> the safety of pedestrians,especially children and <br /> elderly individuals. <br /> Furthermore,the proposed development does not <br /> seem to align with the recent developments in <br /> surrounding communities,which have not shown a <br /> need for such expansion. Instead, it appears to be <br /> driven by developers'interests without considering <br /> the genuine needs and desires of the families in our <br /> community. <br /> Speaking of which, I want to emphasize that the <br /> families in our neighborhood do not want this <br /> development. Many of the residents have made their <br /> voices heard in various forums, expressing their strong <br /> opposition to this project. It is crucial to respect the <br /> wishes of the community members who will be <br /> directly affected by this development. <br /> The potential consequences of this development <br /> extend beyond mere inconvenience;it has the <br /> potential to push the area to be overpopulated, <br /> leading to the displacement of many long-standing <br /> residents. Moreover, our already burdened schools <br /> would be overwhelmed by the influx of new students, <br /> making it challenging for them to provide quality <br /> education. <br /> Another grave concern is the increase in crime that <br /> often accompanies rapid urbanization and population <br /> growth.The introduction of a large development like <br /> this can bring in outsiders and transient populations, <br /> leading to potential security risks and jeopardizing the <br /> safety of our families. <br /> Anonymous To Whom it May Concern, Comment noted.TIF assistance from <br /> (Ramsey Minnesota Rule 4410.1100 requires that EAWs shall the city has not been approved. <br /> Resident) address"known government approvals, reviews, or <br /> 12 <br />