Laserfiche WebLink
C d <br /> Preparing EAWS:A Procedural Guide for <br /> Local RGUs <br /> If an RGU is using its own staff to review the EAW,and is <br /> assessing its costs to the project proposer,it should keep a before making it available for editing by RGU <br /> record of all staff time spent performing environmental review staff,as an experienced consultant can often <br /> tasks. This includes tasks completed by its engineering identify potential problems more quickly,as well <br /> staff,planning staff,administrative staff,etc. By keeping <br /> as recommend solutions. <br /> an accurate record of the hours spent on the proj ect's <br /> environmental review,the RGU will be able to correctly assess RGUs will likely want to have all the necessary <br /> fees for services back to the project proposer. staff members reading/editing the EAW at the <br /> same time,rather than one at a time(and then <br /> After the RGU staff is satisfied with the editing of the handing it off to the next person). Afterwards, <br /> EAW document,it may be a good idea for them to send <br /> the document back to the project proposer for final a meeting can be scheduled to get everyone <br /> review. This allows the proposer to suggest any changes together and discuss staff concerns and/or needed <br /> and/or clarifications that need to be made so that the EAW corrections. This may lead to some duplication, <br /> accurately describes the project and it potential for significant ex.three people identifying the same issue that <br /> environmental effects. While it is important for RGUs to take needs to be addressed,but will ensure a faster <br /> the proposer's comments and information into account,it is review process in the end. <br /> the RGU that is ultimately responsible for the accuracy and <br /> completeness of the information in the EAW. <br /> Step 11-Approve the EAW for distribution and <br /> Helpful Tip make copies <br /> Steps 9 and 10 illustrate the importance of While it is not required,the RGU may want to approve the <br /> understanding whether or not an EAW data EAW for distribution through some kind of formal action or <br /> submittal is complete. Once an RGU verifies a resolution. This makes it clear to everyone—RGU council/ <br /> proposer's submittal is complete,it only has 30 board members,citizens,RGU staff,the proposer,etc.,that the <br /> days(according to the rules)to finalize and edit EAW is officially ready for distribution and public comments. <br /> the document. RGUs should make certain they i <br /> have all needed information and conducted any Preparing the EAW for public notice involves: <br /> analyses or studies prior to notifying the proposer ■ Determining the number of copies of the EAW will <br /> that the data submittal is complete. be needed <br /> ■ Making copies of the EAW <br /> ■ Preparing the mailing list/mailing labels <br /> Helpful Tips ■ Assembling all materials for mailing <br /> When reviewing and editing an EAW,here are <br /> some helpful tips: When the EAW is complete and ready for public notice,RGU <br /> staff should consult the EQB distribution list(located on the <br /> RGU staff should specifically designate someone EQB website)and determine the number of copies that will be <br /> to be the EAW coordinator. This person will be needed. If the EAW is more than 30 pages long or includes a <br /> responsible for making sure the EAW gets to all number of maps and appendices,it may be a good idea to have <br /> necessary staff members and that their input will it bound for easier reading. <br /> be incorporated in into the final draft of the EAW. <br /> If an RGU has hired a consultant to assist in <br /> the review process,it should make certain the <br /> consultant receives the EAW data and documents <br /> as soon as possible. The RGU may even want <br /> to have the consultant review the data submittal <br /> 8 <br />