Laserfiche WebLink
17.Air <br /> a. Stationary Source Emissions— Describe the type, sources, quantities, and compositions <br /> of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any <br /> hazardous air pollutants and criteria pollutants. Discuss effects to air quality including <br /> any sensitive receptors, human health, or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a <br /> discussion of any methods used to assess the project's effect on air quality and the <br /> results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures <br /> that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary <br /> source emissions. <br /> No stationary source air emissions are anticipated; therefore, no mitigation is required. <br /> b. Vehicle Emissions— Describe the effect of the project's traffic generation on air <br /> emissions. Discuss the project's vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify <br /> measures (e.g., traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that <br /> will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. <br /> Motor vehicles emit a variety of air pollutants including carbon monoxide (CO), <br /> hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and particulates. The primary pollutant of concern is CO, <br /> which is a byproduct of the combustion process of motor vehicles. CO concentrations are <br /> highest where vehicles idle for extended periods of time. For this reason, CO concentrations <br /> are generally highest in the vicinity of signalized intersections where vehicles are delayed and <br /> emitting CO. Generally, concentrations approaching state air quality standards are found <br /> within about 100 feet of a roadway source. Further from the road, the CO in the air is <br /> dispersed by the wind such that concentrations rapidly decrease. <br /> The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has developed a screening method <br /> designed to identify intersections that will not cause a carbon monoxide (CO) impact above <br /> state standards. MnDOT has demonstrated that even the 10 highest traffic volume <br /> intersections in the Twin Cities do not experience CO impacts. Therefore, intersections with <br /> traffic volumes lower than these 10 highest intersections will not cause a CO impact above <br /> state standards. MnDOT's screening method demonstrates that intersections with total daily <br /> approaching traffic volumes below 82,300 vehicles per day will not have the potential for <br /> causing CO air pollution problems. None of the intersections impacted by the project exceed <br /> the criteria that would lead to a violation of the air quality standards <br /> c. Dust and Odors— Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity <br /> of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust <br /> may be discussed under Item 17a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity <br /> of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify <br /> measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. <br /> The project may generate temporary fugitive dust emissions during construction. These <br /> emissions would be controlled by sweeping,watering, or sprinkling, as appropriate or as <br /> prevailing weather and soil conditions dictate. Dust emissions are not anticipated during <br /> operations as all surfaces will either be impervious or vegetated. <br /> The construction and operation of the project are not expected to generate objectionable <br /> odors. <br /> Haviland Fields EAW 23 July 2023 <br />