My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 02/08/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2024
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 02/08/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:55:34 AM
Creation date
2/6/2024 1:53:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
02/08/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
H �L� RS <br /> PUBLIC FINANC1. , �, <br /> City's tax rate would need to increase by 0.062% to make up for tax capacity captured as TIF in <br /> the "a" election scenario. This increase means the median value home in Ramsey ($350,100) <br /> would have a tax bill that was $2.08 higher annually. <br /> Pro Forma Analysis <br /> Since the facility will be owned by the company, this analysis treats the Medart project as an <br /> independent income producing real estate venture that might be built by a third party (developer) <br /> and leased back to the business. In this scenario, we explored whether the project costs and end <br /> sources of funds (rent paid by the business) would meet typical market returns to attract private <br /> financing from a bank and developer equity. From this analysis, we conclude TIF assistance up to <br /> $1.5 million ($1.157 million present value) is justified for the project. <br /> The table below shows the proposed sources and uses of funds without any assistance and with <br /> the recommended level of assistance. <br /> FMAmount Pct. Amount Pct. <br /> Developer Financing- 1 st Mortgage 87205,421 70.00% 81205,421 70.00% <br /> Developer Financing-TIF 1,1575031 9.87% 0 0.00% <br /> Developer Equity 2,359578 20.13% 3,516,609 30.00% <br /> TOTAL SOURCES 1137229030 100.00% 1197229030 100.00% <br /> Amount %of Cost Amount %of Cost <br /> Acquisition Costs 21689,830 22.95% 276897830 22.95% <br /> Construction Costs/Site Work 71472,000 63.74% 71472,000 63.74% <br /> Financing Costs Prof. Services 0 0.00% 0 0.00% <br /> Site Improvements 1,560,200 13.31% 11560,200 13.31% <br /> Machinery and Equipment 0 0.00% 0 0.00% <br /> TOTAL USES 113722,030 100.00% 111722,030 100.00% <br /> If this project were to be delivered by a developer on a for-lease basis to Medart in the current <br /> market, the developer may be expected to provide 30 percent equity to obtain debt financing for <br /> the remaining 70 percent of project costs. This is the assumption used in the analysis and <br /> included on the table above. <br /> A developer building a project like this for lease back to a tenant would anticipate receiving a 10 <br /> percent Cash-on-Cash ("COC") return. A COC rate of return is simply the annual net cashflow <br /> from the project (after expenses and debt service) divided by the initial equity investment. A 10 <br /> percent COC is standard for this type of project. <br /> Based on the total development costs and proposed financing for this project, we estimate a <br /> business (like Medart) would need to pay a blended lease rate of approximately $9.70 per square <br /> foot without any assistance for a developer to achieve an average 10 percent COC return for this <br /> BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT'S WHAT WE DO. �7 infoCehlers-inc.com 1 (800)552-1171 www.ehiers-inc.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.