Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Norman responded that he is not sure. This is just a feasibility study to see if a golf <br />course is even feasible. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that if it is just parkland, he would support this but <br />when we cross boundaries into the industrial area, that is where his support ceases. He <br />would like to see an aerial photo from the County Surveyor's office that shows the <br />boundary of the landfill and where the course is laid out and how it is laid out. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec commented that there would be more taxes paid because it is a golf course. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if anyone knows if the County of Anoka is making <br />money on Greenhaven. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec responded that cities do make money on golf courses and the private <br />sector does not make as much. <br /> <br />Direction of the Council was to place this item on the Finance Committee agenda. <br /> <br />#8: Other <br /> <br />a) 25-Year Anniversary <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly feels she needs some staff input and asked if it is the plan to <br />cross Highway #5 with the parade. She asked, if so, at what period of time, what distance <br />and what is possible. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to what can be done and what the costs may be. <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that Council needs to know how much money the City <br />is committing to that is not part of the $15,000 budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Norman offered that staff will work with putting a real budget together. He will meet <br />with the Anniversary Committee on Wednesday and will then make a presentation to the <br />Council. <br /> <br />It was noted by Council that there are a lot of questions relating to this celebration that <br />are not being answered. Mr. Norman promised to get answers and to provide more detail <br />on the budget. <br /> <br />A concern was expressed about a tent and whether or not it would only be used for a <br />church service. If that is the case, at least one Councilmember is against that. If it would <br />serve a multi-purpose, it would be agreed upon. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session - May 3, 1999 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />