Laserfiche WebLink
City Administrator Norman explained that there is already an established need for the position. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that she is concerned over the allocation of tasks. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that delaying the hiring process will only delay City <br />Administrator tasks from being completed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that if the wrong person is hired then the tasks will not be able <br />to be completed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that it was a real valuable thing to bring outside secretarial <br />services to relieve Jo from some of her duties and that sometimes being innovative rather then <br />replacing people is beneficial. He suggested the idea of contracting out part of the job duties and <br />to split the remaining duties among existing employees. He questioned if there would be an <br />outside source that could assist with some of the work instead of hiring someone for the short- <br />term. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that he would explore the options and bring them back to a <br />work session. <br /> <br />7) Administrative Policy-Vacation Donation <br /> <br />This item was tabled until the next Personnel Committee meeting. <br /> <br />Case #9: Report from Finance Committee <br /> <br />1) Increase of Sewer Rates <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund stated that at the June 21, 1999, City Council work session, it was <br />requested that the City of Ramsey's sewer rate be increased by 2%. This increase was <br />recommended based on the findings of the 1998 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report which <br />stated that the Sewer Fund's revenue was minimally exceeding the actual expenses of the Fund. <br />The Sewer Fund has seen large sewer service charges from the Metropolitan Council in the past <br />year, in that the Met Council has been completing a "catch up" in its billing for actual usage. <br />Whereas, in the past, the bill that was submitted was based on estimates, now actual figures are <br />being used; thus, the reason for only a slight increase in revenues. This slight increase does not <br />leave a "cushion" for any emergency expenditures. The City currently charges a flat rate of <br />$55.81 for residential usage and $55.81 + 2.54 per 1,000 gallons in excess of 20,000 gallons for <br />commercial properties. The proposed 2% increase would bring these rates to $56.93 and $56.93 <br />+ $2.54/1,000 gallons, respectively. In comparison, the Metropolitan Council was charging <br />$27,276 for the first quarter of 1999, and $23,225 for each quarter thereafter. The proposed rate <br />increase would affect approximately 1,700 residential customers and 70 commercial businesses. <br />The increase would go into effect on the third quarter 1999 utility bill. <br /> <br />City Council/August 24, 1999 <br /> Page 21 of 25 <br /> <br /> <br />