Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />9. That the Applicant is proposing to erect a wall sign that will exceed the allowable wall sign <br />restrictions by 40.5 square feet and height restriction by 3 feet. <br />10. That a conditional use permit to exceed sign size restrictions by 40.5 square feet will /will not <br />grant the Applicant special privileges that are denied by the City Code to other properties in <br />the commercial area. <br />11. That the proposed increase in wall signage will be designed so as to be harmonious and <br />appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the vicinity and will not <br />change the essential character of the area. <br />12. That the proposed increases in sign surface will not adversely impact traffic in the area. <br />13. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise <br />detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br />14. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not substantially impair the use, enjoyment, or <br />market value of any surrounding property. <br />15. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or <br />future neighboring uses. <br />16. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not create excessive additional requirements at <br />public cost for public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic <br />welfare of the community. <br />17. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not involve activities and uses that will be <br />detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production <br />of glare. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Kurak, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />Mayor Gamec <br />Councilmember Zimmerman <br />Councilmember Kurak <br />Councilmember Anderson <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />Councilmember Hendriksen <br />and the following abstained: <br />None <br />RESOLUTION #01 -09 -364 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />