Laserfiche WebLink
Jim Maloney of John Oliver & Associates, Inc., representing the applicant, stated he has <br />submitted a letter to the Council regarding the variance denial. He stated they have worked <br />diligently through this process with the City on all of the various issues. The initial staff letter to <br />Ron Tallman dated July 1, 2005, made no mention of cul-de-sac issues. The next City of <br />Ramsey Review Letter dated January 27, 2006, discusses the temporary cul-de-sac. It was never <br />raised as an issue that this cul-de-sac is an item that could derail the entire project. Mr. Maloney <br />stated his letter dated today respectfully asks the Ramsey City Council to reconsider the variance <br />denial by the Board of Adjustment. The current preliminary plat shows a 1,100 foot temporary <br />cul-de-sac along Nutria Street. The Planning & Zoning Commission opted to deny the <br />preliminary plat due to concems for public safety. He expressed frustration in that this issue was <br />not brought up in the initial sketch plan review and approval in July of 2005. Their sketch plan <br />was not denied, it was approved. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated sketch plans are not approved or denied; <br />however, at the first sketch plan review the Council came out strongly stating this plat should not <br />be developed at this time due to the access problems. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook noted he had suggested the applicant contact the adjacent property owner, <br />and it was recommended this plat could go forward if them were two connections included. <br /> <br />Mr. Maloney replied this is duly noted; however, in later correspondence staff did refer to the <br />temporary cul-de-sac. In the meantime they have been responding to City comments requiring <br />preparation of site grading and utility plans, a detailed design of the cluster septic wastewater <br />treatment system, a wetland study and mitigation permit, a tree replacement plan, and a <br />landscape plan. All of this work was done at a significant expenditure of time and money. He <br />understands that the City is wary of temporary cul-de-sacs, and that some temporary cul-de-sacs <br />have been that way for 20 years. However, in this case the adjacent Alicia subdivision was <br />developed in 1997 or 1998, and 171st Avenue has been stubbed to the eastern limits of that <br />subdivision. Mr. Maloney stated the temporary cul-de-sac is an interim condition. The <br />preliminary platted streets align with the future regional street grid and provide for future <br />developments to comprehensively connect. The owner of the property, Mr. Jim Lang, has <br />suggested restricting parking along the proposed Nutria Street as a potential solution to City <br />access and safety concerns until street connections are made to the adjacent developments. <br />Eliminating parking from one or both sides of the street would significantly reduce congestion <br />and improve access for fire trucks and other emergency responders. Mr. Lang also mentioned <br />that two central lots could be dedicated for off-street parking until 171st Avenue or Nutria Street <br />is ultimately extended. Mr. Maloney stated in his experience he has dealt with a number of <br />temporary cul-de-sacs that match the comprehensive plan of the cities. This has been with <br />consternation by the emergency responders, but he has seen things mesh together and ultimately <br />development occurs in an orderly manner. If a 600-foot cul-de-sac is stubbed with three lots <br />there will never be access to the adjacent area. This is one reason they are asking for some <br />reconsideration on the variance issue. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated based on similar applications that have been denied he would have a <br />difficult time voting in favor of this variance. He suggested the applicant contact the adjacent <br />property owner. <br /> <br />City Council / May 9, 2006 <br />Page 12 of 30 <br /> <br /> <br />