Laserfiche WebLink
SENIOR HOUSING <br />PARTNERS <br />Entitlement <br />G lir u'l°I s I r? r. IPA 1) th I f rr rr <br />p <br />p ica.tI <br />(Vuml IVIIIb <br />ires yteria iJ <br />o s & services <br />0.11 <br />Narrative <br />Through concentrating density on the south side of the site, the proposal is able to incorporate robust density <br />transitioning to create a density that is at or below the surroundings to the west and the north as well as <br />incorporate park like elements for the community. The proposal takes screening very seriously and uses the <br />existing trees as a buffer on the north and west where they exist. This will create a natural screening that is <br />consistent with Section 475 in the Ramsey City Code. The proposal features a park -like campus that is both <br />set apart from neighboring buildings and is intentional. HVAC units will be screened as well to maximize <br />curb appeal, create a cohesive campus, and hide back of house areas. <br />Parks <br />Presbyterian Homes & Services proposes to expand solstice park including two pickleball courts on the <br />northwest side of the site. This should bolster and expand Solstice Park. Additionally, it is proposed to add <br />parking for Solstice Park improving a neighborhood park for the long term. <br />Traffic <br />Presbyterian Homes & Services proactively commissioned a traffic study conducted by Kimley-Horn. <br />There is additional discussion anticipated with the City of Ramsey and Anoka County with regard to site <br />access. <br />The proposal seeks to minimize traffic. It may go without saying, but residents of seniors housing take <br />fewer trips than the residents of a single-family home (3.2 trips per day vs. 9.5 trips per day according to <br />the Institute of Transportation Engineers 11th Edition). Seniors in single family homes take an estimated <br />4.5 trips per day. The 180 combined units of seniors generate materially fewer trips than a similar all age <br />development. For that reason, the proposal with its 180 senior units actually generates an anticipated 7.1% <br />fewer trips than what could be built in the current zoning. These fewer trips should correspond to less traffic <br />than what could be built by right on the site. <br />Current Zoning Proposed Zoning <br />Land Use Description ITE#• Daily Trips/Unit Units Daily Trips Units Daily Trips Daily Trip Var. <br />Single Family Detatched Housing 210 IItlItIlF;NI' PlYAr"';°;" 20 189 0 0 <br />Multi -Family Housing (Low -Rise) 220 6.7 84 566 0 0 <br />Multi -Family Housing (Mid -Rise) 221 4.5 278 1,262 280 1,271 <br />Senior Adult Housing- Single Family 251 4.3 0 0 20 86 <br />Senior Adult Housing - Multi -Family 252 8,2" 0 0 160 518 <br />Total 382 2,017 460 1,875 -7.1% <br />Note <br />*Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. <br />