Laserfiche WebLink
removal of fire over the past several decades, aspen remains a minor component accounting for less than 4% of the <br />trees in our survey. Red maple was also one of those minor components. It accounted for about 1% of the trees <br />found in our survey, once again, despite its present popularity as an ornamental. The native basswood and the <br />linden ornamentals were rarely found, even less common than Lombardy poplar. <br />One of the "success stories" may be the abundance of red pine, our State Tree. Red pine of all ages appeared in <br />good condition. Green ash is often over -planted in Minnesota communities but despite its #6 ranking overall in our <br />survey, it accounts for less than 4% of the trees found and is much less common than Siberian elm. More than half <br />of the green ash found were present as regeneration. <br />Only in areas 1 and 4 were oaks found in significant numbers as regeneration. Siberian elm and buckthorn are <br />common as regeneration. <br />Conclusion <br />With the caution noted earlier in mind, we are hesitant to draw any conclusions. That being said, there are several <br />items worthy of note. <br />1. Invasive exotic trees are common in much of Ramsey. This is a problem throughout the Twin Cities <br />metropolitan area. The large numbers of Siberian elms were a bit of a surprise. <br />2. Over -planted in much of Minnesota's communities, green ash is arguably underutilized to date. <br />3. Oaks that grow well on the sandy soils of Ramsey are not found too frequently either as regeneration or <br />young plantings. <br />4. Red pine, despite its prominence as our State Tree and success as a component in the Ramsey urban <br />forest, may be over utilized here. Jack pine, common on northern portions of the Anoka Sand Plain, might <br />make an appropriate substitute. <br />5. American elms can still be found as a dominant tree in some locations, but the abundance of Siberian <br />elms that can harbor Dutch elm disease may pose a threat to our native elms. <br />6. Red maple was once a common understory tree in the fire -dependent ecosystems native to Anoka County <br />but is not very common at this time. <br />7. Similarly, paper birch is likely not as common as it was prior to development. <br />8. As with many Minnesota communities, Colorado blue spruce is over planted. <br />9. Basswood and linden species could be used more often though judiciously. <br />10. Hackberry is probably underutilized at this point in time. <br />In order to draw valid conclusions and recommendations about the City's urban forest, further study is warranted. <br />Because the City has the most control over its own properties, studies performed there can produce <br />recommendations that can more easily be put into action and effect change. Inventories could be made within City <br />road right-of-ways, within City parks and on other City -owned land. Such and inventory might likely include, as <br />this survey did, a combination of plot sampling in larger forested areas and complete tree inventories along City <br />streets and mowed areas of parks and other public spaces. <br />Studies of private properties may not produce "scientific" or unbiased results. With the need to gain permission to <br />access properties to perform the necessary work, the total pool of positive responses may be contain some form of <br />bias and result in a sample that is not representative of the whole of Ramsey's privately -owned urban forest. <br />Surveys of properties that do not require permission (i. e. drive by inspections) may not produce the level of detail <br />necessary to draw solid conclusions and would be difficult to compare to more detailed surveys of City -owned <br />lands. <br />We encourage the City to entertain the idea of future surveys of its urban forest. Whether the end is to guide <br />development away from high quality natural resources, restore degraded natural resources, protect the diversity of <br />