My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 11/06/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2006
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 11/06/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:30:22 PM
Creation date
4/19/2024 9:32:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
11/06/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In area 4, 69.9% (256) trees are regeneration, though prickly ash is rarely larger than 4" DBH and grows more like <br />a shrub. If we discount this species 55.5% (203) trees are regeneration and boxelder becomes the most common <br />tree regenerating in this area. <br />Table 9. Regeneration Diversity <br />Species Count Percent <br />Ash, prickly 53 20.7 <br />Boxelder 49 19.1 <br />Cherry, black 29 11.4 <br />Oak, red 26 10.2 <br />Oak, bur 23 9.0 <br />Buckthorn 22 8.6 <br />Cherry, ornamental 16 6.3 <br />Aspen 10 3.9 <br />Redcedar, eastern 8 3.1 <br />Elm, Siberian 6 2.3 <br />Elm, American 3 1.2 <br />Other 11 4.3 <br />Plot Data. The thirty, circular plots were intentionally located in a variety of areas to try to capture as much <br />information relating to all tree species that might be growing in each subdivision in addition to some information <br />about conditions at the site. Some were located in wetlands: others included lawns, driveways and gardens while <br />others were entirely in wooded areas. Plot locations and the data collected at each plot have been submitted to the <br />City as a GIS layer. <br />Some information of note: <br />1. Common buckthorn was found at one-third of the plots <br />2. Honeysuckle was found at five plots <br />3. American elms are dominant or nearly so at three of the sites <br />4. Oaks are dominant at nearly on -half of the sites regardless of the fact that at none of three subdivisions <br />did oaks account for as much as 30% of all trees. <br />More on this information in the Discussion section. <br />Discussion <br />Three of the ten most common species found during this project are not native to Minnesota (Siberian elm, <br />common buckthorn and Colorado blue spruce) and two are not native to North America (Siberian elm and common <br />buckthorn). This is important because Siberian elm and common buckthorn are considered undesirable and <br />invasive. Both tend to exclude more desirable species. Amur maple was not as common, but also fits this category. <br />The plot data shows buckthorn at only one-third of the plots despite being one of the most common trees in the <br />survey. This is due, in part, to many of the plots being located wholly or partly in lawns, where buckthorn is much <br />less frequently found than in wooded settings. This means, however, that where it is found, it is plentiful and <br />provides a substantial seed source for further spread. <br />Two of the most common trees in Minnesota, aspen and paper birch, are not so common in the City of Ramsey. <br />Only nine paper birch were counted despite its popularity as an ornamental tree. Historically, aspen is known to be <br />a minor component in the fire -dependent ecosystems such as that which once existed in this area. Yet with the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.