Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 7 — Status Quo — Approach 4 - Individual Lime Softening Water <br /> Treatment Plants <br /> In the absence of a project driver or an incentive to do something different, the Northwest Metro cities <br /> will most likely continue to utilize groundwater as their source of drinking water. This section identifies <br /> infrastructure that may be necessary in the future with individual community continued reliance on <br /> groundwater. <br /> 7.1 Lime Softening <br /> To provide an equivalent comparison to Approaches 1-3, it is assumed that the Northwest Metro cities <br /> will construct lime softening WTPs. A potential driver for selecting a lime softening treatment process <br /> for community drinking water systems is a future wastewater discharge limit for chlorides in the Twin <br /> Cities metro area receiving waters. <br /> The majority of the chloride in wastewater comes from the regeneration process of home water <br /> softeners. A sodium chloride solution (salt brine) is used to displace calcium and magnesium <br /> (hardness compounds)from ion-exchange softening resin. The waste product is discharged to the <br /> sanitary sewer. <br /> The only practical way to eliminate chloride from wastewater is to eliminate home water softeners and <br /> provide a water supply that is softened at a municipal lime softening water treatment plant. The lime <br /> softening process does not add chloride to wastewater. This follows best practices currently <br /> recommended by the state to reduce chlorides in wastewater treatment plant discharge. <br /> In addition to hardness, the lime softening process and subsequent filtration process would also <br /> remove iron and manganese. <br /> 7.2 2040 Water Infrastructure <br /> The Northwest Metro communities will need to add additional wells to meet 2040 demands. It is also <br /> assumed that lime softening water treatment plants are also added. Table 7-1 identifies the water <br /> infrastructure needed to meet 2040 demands and estimated costs. <br /> Page—31 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />