Resolution - #93-10-243 - 10/12/1993

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. The motion fo and upon vote Mayor Coun~ Counei Coun i Count[ That:~ eet~ ~n 9.11.09 (Screening) of the Ramsey City Code requires that all outside storage be s~ ~en .~:J on all property lines and that screening may consist of plantings or fencing or a combi ration thereof. That~t~e ~pplicant has indicated that the towing service will employee 1 office staff person and ~ tt tl~ shop may be occupied by a cabinet maker and the garage may be occupied by an aal ) .n~chanic. Based on this information, the eight (8) employee/customer parking spaC-~:,, ac~otmted for on the site plan would appear to be sufficient. Thatl :'n C4~nversations with Anoka County Environmental Services, City Staff has detet~ ~ine~l that caution should be taken to ensure that in the impound lot, fluid residue from.· chicles is contained on site and that the asphalt has been treated to a non-permeable stage, ~ That~e P~, posed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to existing or That,~e pi'oposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment or market value ~f ~y surrounding property. That t~he I~roposed use will be operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and apprC~t~ in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and th~ ~- r~pos~d use will not change the essential character of the area. That .~e proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses.~ : That t~e l~posed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such a~ struts, police and fire protection. That fle P-~posed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for publi~ ?aei!ifies and services. That th e p~oposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials and equipment and ¢~ adifions of operation that will be detrimental to any neighboring properties or personl by!reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, or odors. That t~e/~Pplicant has stated that there would be no than impounded vehi¢le~ st~d in the impound lot at any one time. more twenty (20) That it! co~.~ versafions with the Metropolitan Pollution Control Agency, City Staff has deter~[ne~ that a Storm Sewer Run-off Permit is not required for the proposed use. Howev er, ~he City can generally require the Applicant to conform with best management praeti~es got the purpose of eliminating or reducing the potential for storm water contains' haaflon. th~.~ adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mayor Gilbertson ~ei~., taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ian~s Gilbertson me~nber Glen Hardin me~nber Gerald Zimmerman member Kenneth Peterson me~ber Sheila Beyer