My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/10/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/10/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:39:58 AM
Creation date
7/5/2006 8:06:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/10/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Associate Planner Geisler explained the urban setting of Town Center will not be continued into <br />this area, which will be a typical suburban type setting. The desire is for a higher quality of <br />design including amenities such as pedestrian paths, etc., but it will not be an urban environment, <br />which is why there will be a break from Town Center. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt questioned if this code is meant to focus on the concept plan for the <br />development of the 60 acres adjacent to Town Center, or if it is meant to be a B-3 district that <br />can be used somewhere along Highway 10. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Ge~sler rephed this B-3 dtstnct ts not wntter~fo accomphsh a specific plan, but <br />to accomplish a master developed site: , ~:,~:.~ ;;! (i~~ <br /> <br />Chatrperson Ntxt stated tf thts code ~s to bef. wntten with 'the intent o£'develop~ng this s~te <br />adjacent to Town Center they can be much mot* specific about how ~twitt. faeditatepedestnan <br />traffic while allowing the flexibility for large re~a.i!~ih ms is not an"e:~t~Sio~}d'f the Town <br />Center District, but it needs to be recognized that it i¢:~e'dihte!y adjacent ~b'.~T0wn Center and <br />will be able to drive development into the Towri C~nieiD[st'ri~¥there will be a relationship <br />between the two areas. The dewatton should begin w~th the arc~e¢~ standards. <br /> <br />Assomate Planner Ge~sler indicated the dr~ft C0de. re~slon will be'.qF the agenda of the July <br />meeting for a public hearing. <br /> <br />Case #13: <br /> <br />Staff Update <br /> <br />The StaffUpdate was noted. <br />Case #14: <br /> <br /> Zoning <br /> <br /> was <br /> <br />OTHER~COMMIS,,SIONBUSINESS,: : ? <br /> <br />1)'e: i ~-Lrpc°ming Meetings X <br /> <br />X~Sfstant: 'Community Devel(/l~in~t Director Frolik indicated a joint meeting with the City <br />c°~CiI i~ tehtatively schedUI~C[:f°~ Monday, June 26th at 6:30 or 7:00 p.m. to review the draft <br />Central'Rural Regerve ', <br /> <br />Chairperson N[~ Lndi~atdd h~will not be available on June 26m. <br /> <br />The consensus of th¢'C°~mission was to continue with the proposed date of June 26th for the <br />joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt suggested the July 6th regular meeting be rescheduled. <br /> <br /> Planning Commission/June I, 2006 <br />160 Page 18 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.