Laserfiche WebLink
That due to its unique shape, location, and wetlands, the Subject Property cannot meet the <br />intent of Section 9.50.30, Subd. 2(b) without exceeding the 600 foot cul-de-sac length <br />restriction in Section 9.50.30, Subd. 3(g) for the following reasons: a) the current length of <br />Argon exceeds the 600 foot maximum as a result of a variance granted in 1993; b) <br />connection to the west onto T.H. #47 would not be allowed since it would not comply with <br />the access management spacing proscribed for TH 47; c) an outlet to Waco Street to the east <br />is obstructed by existing homes; d) a future road connection to the south is not feasible or <br />warranted because it would require the filling of wetlands. <br /> <br />That the basis for the 600 foot cul-de-sac length restriction relates to the fact that water has to <br />be trucked into rural areas not served by municipal water and fire trucks typically were <br />equipped with 600 feet of hose. <br /> <br />That the Subject Property is in the urban service area and there currently is one fire hydrant <br />on Argon Street N.W. and an additional fire hydrant will be required within the boundaries of <br />Amber Ridge 2na Addition. <br /> <br />10. That the special conditions causing the undue hardship do/do not result from the actions of <br /> the Applicant. <br /> <br />I 1. That if granted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is <br /> denied to other owners of lands, structures or buildings in the same district. <br /> <br />12. That if granted, the variance will/will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the <br /> Ramsey Zoning Chapter. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />That if granted, the variance will/will not substantially increase the congestion of public <br />streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially impair <br />property values within the neighborhood. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereofi <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly adopted by the Ramsey Board of Adjustment this <br />the 10th day of July, 2006. <br /> <br />Chairperson <br /> <br /> Resolution #06-07- <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />