Laserfiche WebLink
11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />That the Subject Property where the Super Bowl sign is proposed to be placed <br />currently has an 85 square foot free-standing sign fronting Hwy. #10 and one lawful <br />non-conforming free-standing sign fronting Riverdale Street N.W., for a total <br />square footage of free-standing signs in the amount of 108 square feet. <br /> <br />That the total amount of existing and proposed free-standing sign space requested <br />for the Subject Property is 180 square feet. <br /> <br />That there are numerous other commercial operations in the community that do not <br />have direct highway exposure for their identification signs. <br /> <br />That if the request for the placement of an additional free-standing sign on the <br />Subject Property is approved, it will set a precedent for off-site advertising signs, <br />number of free-standing signs on a single parcel, and total square footage of free- <br />standing sign space. <br /> <br />That the existing wall sign on the Super Bowl facility is visible from Hwy. #10 and <br />according to City Code, the Super Bowl facility is also eligible for the placement of <br />a 100 square foot pylon sign, up to 25 feet in height, on the same property as the <br />Super Bowl facility. <br /> <br />That if granted, the conditional use permit will grant the Applicant special privileges <br />that are denied by the City Code to other properties in the commercial area. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public <br />cost for public facilities and services and will not be den/mental to the economic <br />welfare of the community. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not involve equipment and conditions of operation that <br />will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of <br />excessive production of glare. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing findings of fact was duly seconded by <br />Councilmember Beahen and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor <br />thereof: <br /> <br />Mayor Glen Hardin <br />Councilmember Kenneth Peterson <br />Councilmember Carolyn Beahen <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />Councilmember Sheila Beyer <br />Councilmember Gerald Zimmerman <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br /> <br />