Laserfiche WebLink
Board Member Bawden introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #98-05-072 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT #0454 RELATING TO A <br />REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN THE SINGLE FAMILY <br />RURAL SERVICE AREA <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, John M. Gobematz and Avis M. Gobematz, hereinafter referred to as <br />"Applicants", have properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance from Section 9.20.11 of <br />the Ramsey City Code to plat two 2.5 acre lots in the Rural Service Area. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />That the Applicants appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant <br />to Section 9.03.05 of the Ramsey City Code on May 5, 1998, and that said public hearing <br />was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated <br />as a part of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />That the Applicants have submitted a request for variance in order to complete division of <br />the family estate with four children, two of which received 2.5 acre lots created in 1989, in <br />accordance with the minimum lot size at that time. <br /> <br />3. That the new lots created would be utilized single family dwelling sites. <br /> <br />That effective January 1, 1990, the City of Ramsey, as part of an expansion to the <br />Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), committed to a 4 units in 40 acre development <br />standard outside the MUSA, and amended minimum lots sizes to a range from 2.5 to 10 <br />acres. Property north of Trott Brook was established as the Rural Service Area with a <br />minimum lot size of 10 acres. <br /> <br />That the Subject Property is zoned R-1 Rural Residential, is 35 acres in size, and is in the <br />Rural Service Area. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />That the Applicant is now proposing to convey property to the final two children at a lot <br />size comparable to what the first two children received (2.5 acres each) and in order to <br />maintain as much of the property as possible for their own agricultural purposes. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />That some of the other existing parcels in the neighborhood, that were also created prior to <br />1990, are less than 2.5 acres in size. <br /> <br />That the Applicant's proposal for 3 lots in 35 acres maintains compliance with the 4 units <br />in 40 acres density restriction and meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br /> <br />