Laserfiche WebLink
Board Member Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 098-10-241 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT #0473 RELATING TO A REQUEST <br />FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NEARER THE <br />FRONT PROPERTY LINE THAN THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, Lawrence and Sherfie Thole, hereinafter referred to as "Applicants," have <br />properly applied for a variance from Section 9.11.02 of the Ramsey City Code to construct an <br />accessory garage nearer the front property line than the principal structure on the property <br />generally known as 17440 Gibbon Street N.W. and legally described as follows: <br /> <br />Lot 3, Block 1, DEERWOOD, Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />That the Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing pursuant to Section 9.03.05 of the <br />Ramsey City Code on October 6, 1998, and that said public hearing was properly advertised, <br />and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings <br />by reference. <br /> <br />2. That the subject property is zoned R-1 Rural Residential and is approximately 3.3 acres in <br /> size. <br /> <br />3. That the subject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential zoning developed with <br /> single family homes. <br /> <br />4. That Section 9.11.02 of the Ramsey City Code does not permit the construction of accessory <br /> structures nearer the front property line than the principal structure. <br /> <br />5. That the principal structure on the subject property is approximately 222 feet from the front <br /> property line. <br /> <br />6. That there is a barn on the Subject Property that is nearer the front property line than the <br /> principal structure for which the City granted a variance in 1986. <br /> <br />That when the Applicants assumed ownership of the property, there was a garage on the <br />Subject Property that was considered non-conforming because it was constructed <br />approximately 110 feet closer to the front property line than the home, without benefit of a <br />variance. <br /> <br /> <br />