Laserfiche WebLink
That the sign proposed at the Ramsey Blvd. access will be 112 square feet (aggregate surface <br />area of 224 square feet) in size and the sign proposed at the Industry Avenue access will be <br />45 square feet (aggregate surface of 90 square feet) in size. <br /> <br />9. That the Applicant's proposal exceeds the number of ground signs by one and one of the <br /> signs exceeds the sign size restriction by 12 square feet. <br /> <br />10. That the Applicant is proposing to have the signs back lit. <br /> <br />11. That the intent of the one sign per parcel rule was to eliminate sign clutter. <br /> <br />12. That the Applicant's parcel is exceptionally large and had the property been platted into one <br /> acre industrial lots in accordance with City Code regulations, there would be a potential for <br /> 40 business identification signs on the Subject Property. <br /> <br />13. That the City has previously approved exceeding the sign size restrictions in the commercial <br /> districts. <br /> <br />14. That if granted, the conditional use permit will not grant the Applicant special privileges that <br /> are denied by the City Code to other properties in the commercial area. <br /> <br />15. That the proposed increase in number of signs and sign surface will be designed so as to be <br /> harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the <br /> vicinity and will not change the essential character of the area. <br /> <br />16. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not adversely impact traffic in the area. <br /> <br />17. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise <br /> detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />18. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not substantially adversely impair the use, <br /> enjoyment, or market value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />19. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or <br /> future neighboring uses. <br /> <br />20. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not create excessive additional requirements at <br /> public cost for public facilities and services, and it will/will not be detrimental to the <br /> economic welfare of the community. <br /> <br />21. That the proposed increase in sign surface will not involve activities and uses that will be <br /> detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production <br /> of glare. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Hendriksen, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #99-01-023 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />