My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/12/1988
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1988
>
Agenda - Council - 01/12/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 12:19:43 PM
Creation date
7/17/2006 9:05:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/12/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />SAFETY REVIEW OF COUKTY ROAD NUMBER 56 <br /> <br />Traffic Volume <br />The traffic volume on County Road No. 56 is approximately 2,000 <br />vehicles per day on the north end, and 6,500 vehicles per day on <br />the south end, which indicates that the majority of the traffic <br />on the road is from the local area. <br /> <br />Speed Limits <br />County Road 56 was last studied for speed limits in 1977. At <br />that time the existing limits were authorized. Anoka County does <br />not study or authorize speed limit changes. The establishment of <br />speed limits is a responsibility of the Commissioner of <br />Transportation. A new study of the area can be instigated by a <br />request from the City Council to the County Highway Committee of <br />the County Board. Caution is necessary in evaluating the desire <br />to have an area restudied because if.a ne~ study huthori~es a <br />higher limit, (which has occurred on some segments of the County <br />Highway system following a restudy), the higher limit must be <br />posted and becomes the legal limit. <br /> <br />Highway Design <br />The design of the highway exceeds the current standards for a <br />2-lane roadway with shoulders. A 2-lane highway with shoulders <br />is considered an adequate design for the existing and projected <br />(20 year) traffic. Highways of similar design in the County <br />carry up to 20,000 vehicles per day. The roadway does have some <br />areas where the sight distance is insufficient to permit vehicles <br />to pass and these areas are marked with the appropriate warnings. <br />The roadway has some curves designed for less than 50 mph and <br />they also are marked accordingly. <br /> <br />Signalization <br />Anoka County installs signals on the basis of a warrant system <br />published by the Federal Highway Administration and adopted by <br />the Minnesota Department of Transportation for a uniform system <br />of traffic control devices. These warrants consider traffic <br />volumes, pedestrian volumes, school crossings, accidents and <br />delays. At the present time, there are no known locations on CR <br />#56 which meet any of these warrants. If a specific location is <br />thought to possibly WLrrant signalization, we ~re ~illing ~o <br />review that site. <br /> <br />Stop Signs <br />T~e installation of stop signs is also based on warrants and <br />again no locations on Ch #56 are known to meet these warrants. <br /> <br />Sidewalks/Walkway/Bikeway <br />Sidewalks and walkway/bikeways are the best method for providing <br />pedestrian safety along the highway. However, this is a <br />municipal expense, they will encroach on the yards, possibly <br />require tree or fence removal and could require additional <br />right-of-way. As with lighting, the City must determine if the <br />residents are willing to fund this safety feature. <br /> <br />Crosswalks <br />The County installs crosswalks on the County Highway System. <br />Crosswalks are installed at locations where significant <br />pedestrian crossing activity occurs. The crosswalk installations <br />consist of pavement markings and crosswalk signs. An appropriate <br />location for a crosswalk may be at the Tom Thumb store. <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.