Agenda - Council - 08/27/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

' /layor Heitman moved the adoption of the following findings of fact, ' FI IMS OF FACT 0114 MR. OMM JCHNSM ' 1. That the Applicant has applied for a Board of Adjustment variance to construct an accessory structure larger than allowed by City Code. ' 2. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing on July 23, 1985, and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said ' public hearings are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. ' 3. That the Applicant's property is generally knwon as 7241 164th Lane N.W. and is located in an R -1 Residential District. ' 4. That the subject property is less than 2 -1/2 acres in size. S. Tha the Applicant's request is to construct a 32' : 40' accessory structure with an area of 1,280 square feet. The proposed accessory structure will be used for the storage of the Applicant's motor home, boat, snowmobiles, and other personal property. ' 6. That the City Code restricts the total square footage of an accessory structure to 624 square feet maximum on parcels of land ' less than 2 -1/2 acres. 7. That there may be exceptional, unique or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the property in questions as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. ' 8. That such variance may be necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity. The possibility of increased financial return shall not in itself be deemed sufficient to warrant a variance. 9. That the authorization of such variance will not be of ' substantial detriment to adjacent ,property and will not materially impair the intent or purpose of this ordinance or the public interest. 10. That the condition or situation of the subject property, or the intended use of the property for which the variance is ' sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situation. ' 11. That the variance may observe the spirit and intent of the ordinance, may produce substantial justice and may not be ' contrary to the public interest.