Laserfiche WebLink
J <br />should present their recommendation to Oouncil on August 13, 1985. <br />' Further Discussion: Mayor Heitman asked Police Chief Auspos if he thinks the <br />offiors would request arbitration to occur earlier than the time frame Council <br />' is considering in this motion. Councilmember Cox stated that Mayor Heitman's <br />question of it. Auspos is inappropriate. Mk. Auspos stated he has never been a <br />union steward and he doesn't know if an offer can duuige things once an <br />arbitration has been filed for; he is sure the officers are going to request <br />' that the union file for arbitration. Mr. Schnelle stated the issue can be <br />resolved anytime before arbitration begins; however, payment will still be <br />required to both side of arbitration. Oouncilmember Cox stated that it was his <br />understanding that the Personnel Committee was established to be able to <br />discuss matters without making front page news coverage. Councilmember Cox <br />stated that it is important to be respectful of people and matters and Ramsey yIs <br />' Personnel meetings have become a front page fiasoo and that is not appropriate. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmenbers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Rebwnn and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br />' Case #3: Anoka County Environmental Services Committee: <br />' Mr. Schnelle inquired if Council wants to make a statement to the County Board <br />regarding Waste Management of Minnesota Inc's request for a lifting of the <br />development moratorium. Mr. Schnelle stated that not making a statement shows <br />' the County Board that Ramsey is not informed or doesn't care. <br />Councilmember Cox stated that in reviewing the matter more carefully, he <br />believes more than ever, that Waste Mangement of Minnesota is reserving that <br />' area to the north for Site P and if they are going to take soils from the north <br />80, Ramsey should respond to it. Cbuncilmember Cbx stated that he believes <br />Ramsey is being fooled into believing that Waste Management's request will be a <br />' benefit to Ramsey and he doesn't believe it's really what Ramsey wants. <br />Mr. Douglas Fountain was present and stated that in November of 1984, Waste <br />' Management of Minnesota asked Ramsey for 700,000+ yards of cover; they then <br />went to the County and asked for 500,000+ yards of cover; in the meeting with <br />the County Environmental Services last week, Waste Management of Minnesota said <br />they could reduce their request to 200,000+ yards of cover. 4he County <br />' awironmental Services did not make a recommendation; they pissed it onto the <br />Health and Social Services Committee which will be meeting on August 8. The <br />Health and Social Services Committee will make a recommendation to the County <br />' <br />commissioners. Waste Management of Minnesota has not ruled out the possibility <br />of borrowing from the north 80; that area is not in the moratorium area but <br />the process would have to follow City procedures, including a public hearing. <br />' Motion by Mayor Heitman and seconded by Councilmember Cox, for further <br />discussion, to table further discussion of this issue until the results of the <br />Health and Social Services Committee are known. <br />' Further Discussion: Councilmember Cox stated that Ramsey should indicate that <br />whatever procedure or action is taken be consistent with Ramsey's previous <br />' position statement to the County regarding Ramsey not wanting any further <br />activity beyond what is designed at the present landfill configuration and he <br />July 29 1985 <br />' Page 17 of 22 <br />