Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. , NEEDS EVALUATION <br /> A. Perine altemat1ve crossings and land use May 22 Complete <br /> conr1guraUons to be teated. <br /> B. Counell/HnDOT computer program generates July 15 Complete <br /> traffic analysis or the alternatives. <br /> C. Ho/DeT to prepare additional traffic March 15, '86 Complete <br /> analysis tor the by-pass alternatives. <br />5.2 BRIDGE ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION <br /> A. Define bridge candidate criteria for Jan. 31, '86 Complete <br /> tor measuring environmental and <br /> system impacts. <br /> B. Apply criteria to bridges No.'-". 'eb. 28, '86 Complete <br /> (Bridge No. 12, 1-694, is already <br /> scheduled for improvement and was dropped <br /> as an alternate tor further study.) <br /> C. Weight the criteria to reflect individual 'eb. 28, '86 Complete <br /> agency/community goalS and objectives. <br />6. SUHMARY REPORT <br /> A. Prepare progress report on traffic demand. Jan. 21. '86 Complete <br /> B. Prepare progress report on bridge March 20, '86 Complete <br /> alternative I"'ftIt1t\g. <br /> C. Prepare and sublll1t tinal report. May '86 Complete <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />