My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/04/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2006
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/04/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:05:29 PM
Creation date
7/24/2006 3:09:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
04/04/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Morton presented a spreadsheet for the monthly fees, noting they go from $30 to $55 per <br />month. He explained that the fee is dependent on the number of homes and infrastructure that <br />has gone into the system. With the capital replacement costs, they look at the components of the <br />system and if something may fail in 15 years they start putting away those funds on a monthly <br />basis. <br /> <br />Mr. Morton displayed pictures that described construction activity including directional boring, <br />pressure sewer installation, lift stations with redundant pumps, multiple septic tanks, pre- <br />treatment box construction, dosing piping lines, and disposal systems using infiltrator trenches. <br />He also showed pictures of completed projects and a map identifying which States use onsite <br />wastewater systems. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey asked why it is not required to conform to the MPCA requirements for <br />all projects. <br /> <br />Mr. Morton explained the MPCA has set a standard of so many gallons and the City or County <br />could abide by the same standard if they chose to do so. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey asked if the system is managed differently if it is an MPCA approved <br />project. <br /> <br />Mr. Morton stated they manage all systems the same and the engineers also provide <br />recommendations on the best way to manage and operate the system. He explained they rely on <br />the engineer's expertise to assure longevity of the system. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked if most governments use a consulting engineering firm to assure the system <br />is properly designed. <br /> <br />Mr. Morton stated that is correct and it is the same thing with the civil engineering portion of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked if Crow Wing Power is doing the same thing. <br /> <br />Mr. Morton stated he is unsure but TriCounty, in the southern part of Minnesota, is looking at it <br />and other utility firms have contacted him about going on a tour. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked how much do soil conditions impact the design and noted that many <br />systems use ponding areas and open spaces. <br /> <br />Mr. Morton stated The Ponds development in Oak Grove uses the pond water to irrigate the golf <br />course. He stated that soil conditions are a huge consideration, noting that in Sherburne County <br />there is a lot of sand so you can get a decent cost per unit. Mr. Morton stated that the grinder <br />pumps are sometimes in the basement or sometimes outside but they are the responsibility of the <br />home owner. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson asked how often the drain fields are pumped. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / April 4, 2006 <br />Page 3 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.