Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Gerald Zimmerman <br />March 17, 1988 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />disposal systems. In addition, Lots 1 & 2, BloCk 2 and Lots 1, <br />6-10, Block 1 have steep slopes over 18% which are not suitable <br />for an on-site disposal system. Therefore, the placement of an <br />on-site system must be restricted in those areas. <br /> <br />3) In review of the preliminary plat data required by the City <br />Code Section 170.037, the following were not provided: <br /> <br />a) The type of surfacing of existing roads: <br />b) Boundary lines of all land within one hundred (100) <br />feet of the tract of land within the plat, and the name <br />of the owner thereof: <br />c) Minimum front building setback lines as required by the <br />Code of the City: <br />d) statement of proposed use of lots along with the type and <br />number of dwelling units: <br /> <br />4) In review of the drainage, the drainage of Xenon street N.W., <br />needs to be clarified regarding the outlet for the runoff. <br />Additional information regarding the proposed method of <br />conveying surface water drainage within and beyond the limits <br />of the plat to publicly owned or controlled drainage <br />facilities or storm sewer needs to be provided. In addition, <br />drainage easements need to be shown. <br /> <br />5) In review of access to the plat, the developer is proposing to <br />extend l60th Lane N.W. as well as add a temporary cul-de-sac <br />off Nowthen BlvdN.W. The right-of-way width of the cul-de-sac <br />is less than the city Code requirement which is a 65 foot <br />radius. As previously stated, Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block <br />2 do not have 200 feet of frontage on a City street. <br /> <br />We would recommend the developer extend 160th Lane N.W to the <br />N.W. corner of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 14 to provide <br />access to these lots. City Code does not allow access to <br />County"State Aid Highway 5 . consequently, Lot 6, Block 1 , does <br />not meet the City Code for access. <br /> <br />6. The proposed plan did not show any park dedication. Therefore, <br />the plat will be subject to cash payment in lieu of park <br />dedication. <br /> <br />We would recommend approval of the preliminary plat contingent on <br />correcting or obtaining variances on the items stated in this <br />letter. <br /> <br />'3 <br />