Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #18: <br />INFORMATION ITEMS <br />1. At its meeting on March 8, 1988, City Council took the following <br />action: <br />a) Denied a request by Breezy Outdoor, Inc. for a conditional use <br />permit to construct an advertising sign; <br />b) Denied Mr. Tom Guyer's request for a wild animal license; and <br />c) Approved Mr. Richard Dreher's request for site plan review. <br />2. On March 22, 1988, the City Council took the following action: <br />a) Approved Mark and LuAnn Brozak's request for a conditional use <br />permit to operate a printing shop from their garage through March <br />22, 1989; and <br />b) Denied Mr. Timothy Shay's request for a conditional use permit to <br />construct an advertising sign; <br />c) Tabled action on Mr. Richard Sybrant's request for preliminary plat <br />approval of The North Forty until such time as additional access is <br />provided to the north or the east; <br />d) Adopted an ordinance amending Section 110 of the City Code <br />establishing regulations for keeping wild dogs; and <br />e) Denied a proposed ordinance revising the minimum lot sizes for <br />keeping horses as the Council felt that the City should maintain <br />the 3 acre per horse requirement. <br />3. At your March 17 meeting, you requested the City Attorney to draft an <br />emergency ordinance regarding park dedication requirements. The City <br />Attorney determined that such an ordinance does not meet the criteria <br />of Section 3.06 of the City Charter for an emergency ordinance. The <br />City Attorney did suggest, however, that staff negotiate with <br />developers for cash and /or land for park dedication until the park <br />dedication requirements are amended. <br />4. The Park Commission will be reviewing a proposed amendment to the <br />subdivision ordinance revising the park dedication requirements to <br />allow the City to take both land and cash. For your information, <br />enclosed is a copy of the proposed ordinance. <br />149, <br />