04/05/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Chairman Zimmerman noted that in order for the southwest parcel to access the cul-de -sac, Mr. Gordon would have to provide for a 66 foot easement extending from that cul-de -sac and obtain a variance to street frontage or construct an extension of 180th Avenue N.W. into his plat. :f Motion by Chairman Zimmerman and seconded by Commissioner Howell to recommend that Mr. Harley Gordon subdivide his property utilizing the minor platting process; that no soil borings, topography or perk tests would be necessary; and that the plat be reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission. Amendment by Commissioner Howell and seconded by Commissioner Shumway to request in this case, and to establish as standard Planning and Zoning operating procedure, that all minutes pertaining to a case from it's initiation to it's completion will be included as background material each time a case is addressed. Further Discussion: The Commission requested an opportunity to review Mr. Gordon's sketch plan. Amendment carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Shumway, Terry, Howell, LaDue and Holm. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. Notion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Shumway, Terry, Howell, LaDue and Holm. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. #3 Re cruest or A Conditional Ilse Permit To Construc And Ot>erate Office And Warehouse For An El°c` Co aisiness• Case Of Mr. Jeff Erikson: Mr. Erikson reviewed the history of his case. Mr. Erikson referred to the proposed findings of fact and stated that he disagrees with the fact indicating that the office /warehouse will increase traffic to the area. Mr. Erikson explained that he does not anticipate business operations to increase to any more than what it has been over the past 12 years at this location. Discussion ensued regarding the accessory building height .(22' -23'), the height of the principal structure (2 -story home), the location of the accessory structure, the proximity neighboring structures. Motion by Co =issioner Holm and seconded by Commissioner Howell to table action on Mr. Erikson's request for a conditional use permit until such time as a site plan is submitted indicating the number, placement and elevation of existing buildings on the site along with photos. Further Discussion: Ass. Norris noted that the existing business is grandf athered in but to expand that business (a non -conf orming use) from the home into the accessory structure would require a conditional use permit. Co�:unissioner Shumway stated he opposes the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission//A- rch 17, 1988 Page5 of 8 !jil