Laserfiche WebLink
The Commission reviewed the proposed conditional use permit and considered <br />amending it t0 IeStriCt the garage height to 16 feet. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the option for Mr. Erikson to subdivide his <br />property between the home and the new garage; the lot containing the home . <br />would continue to be zoned B -1 but be regulated by its principal use, <br />Residential; the lot containing the garage would retain the B-1 zoning and <br />the garage would not have to be reduced in height. <br />Mr. Erikson requested that the Commission table action on his request for a <br />conditional use permit to allow him more time to study options available to <br />him. <br />Motion by Commissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Holm that upon <br />request of the applicant, action on Mr. Jeff Erikson's request for a <br />conditional use permit is tabled. <br />Further Discussion: Commissioners Howell and Shumway were opposed to <br />tabling and prolonging the case_ <br />Commissioner Holm withdrew his second to table Mr. Erikson's case. <br />Chairman Zimmerman seconded the motion to table Mr. Erikson's case. <br />Amendment by Commissioner Howell and seconded by Commissioner Holm to <br />request that the City Attorney submit a written opinion regarding Mr. <br />Erikson's situation. <br />Amendment carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Terry, <br />Shumway, Holm, Howell and LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner <br />Hendriksen. <br />Notion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Terry, Holm <br />and LaDue. Voting No: Commissioners Howell and Shumway. Absent: <br />Commissioner Hendriksen. <br />[ISSION I <br />Chairman Zimmerman noted that the City approved the attendance of two <br />Planning commissioners at the advanced planning institute in Rochester the <br />week of Parch 21. Commissioners Howell and Shumway were elected to attend <br />the seminar. <br />Case rlO: Di Scusjion r Regarding Trails And 'Park Dedication.: <br />Co=nissioner Shuimay recalle3 that per the Planning Commission's request, <br />the Park Commission has reviewed park dedication requirements. In order to <br />aw.uire only the amount of land necessary from the developer for park <br />dedication and not forfeit any cash that would have been due the City and <br />in order to not delay plats currently before the city, the Park Commission <br />is requesting that Planning and Zoning su=ort their recommendation that <br />City Council adopt an emergency ordinance to allow the city the ability to <br />require a combination of land and fee in lieu of the maximum amount of land <br />Planning and Zoning Cormission/March 17, 1988 <br />Pagel of 8 <br />I& <br />