Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />~'" <br />. ..J <br />';"~i-tl <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I) <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I -.'\ <br /> <br />I) <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer s.tated that he feel's Mr. Berg's comment noted in <br />the minutes should be explained more thoroughly. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Isakson to <br />approve Public Hearing Minutes dated March 1, 1983. <br />I <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Dunn, <br />Zimmerman, Deemer, Isakson and LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Ms. Kathy <br />Schneider. <br /> <br />NOTE COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />lw" <br /> <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission noted the foll owi ng: <br />1. Speci a 1 Counci 1 meeting minutes dated March 21, 1983. <br />2. Special Counci 1 meeting minutes dated March 28, 1983. <br />3. Regular Council meeting minutes dated March 22, 1983. <br />COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: Request Authorization To Subdivide By Metes And Bounds; Case Of Mr. <br />James Gilbertson: <br /> <br />Mr. Gilbertson was present at the meeting and submitted copies of survey of <br />exlsting property and survey of proposed parcels. <br /> <br />Mr. Gilbertson stated the following reasons for request authorization to subdivide: <br />/ <br /> <br />1. In speculation of sewer and water. <br /> <br />2. For tax purposes. <br /> <br />3. For selling purposes'. (Canlt sell one building on the property without <br />selling all three businesses currently located on the property). <br /> <br />Mr. Gilbertson stated that the sizes of the proposed parcels would be .68 acres, <br />.68 acres and 1.5 acres. He further stated that the 3 businesses are currently <br />operating on less than one acre each and all three are up to code as far as <br />parking areas, etc. There is a proposed easement through Tracts Band C to <br />provide access to Tract A. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding easement and landlocking of the proposed Tract A. <br />Planning and Zoning Commission then compiled the following Findings of Fact: <br />1. All three parcels are presently owned by one owner. <br /> <br />P & Z/April 5, 1983 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br />/ <br />/ <br />