Agenda - Council - 08/08/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-304- The following criteria have been identified for determining the appropriate use of a PUD: High Quality Design and Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses The development proposes to meet the requirements for architectural standards in design and proposes variety of detached and attached two -unit, three -unit, and multi -unit structures. Concerning compatibility with surrounding land uses, the northern portion of the site is across from R -2 and the west portion of the site is wetland and park. The southern portion of the site is existing single - family homes, and the density proposed in that portion of the plat conforms to the low - density residential land use designation. Provision of a Wider Range of Housing Types, Prices Ranges, and Styles The proposed development provides more variety than a typical single - family or attached townhome development. The styles of the homes will vary as well. It is unclear whether this development will offer a wide array of price ranges. Public Amenities and Open Spaces The proposed development offers 50% private open space in addition to the 6 -acre wetland preservation, and includes the wetland buffer and stormwater ponds. The site also offers 36% of its space for active common yard space for recreation. The plat proposes to develop multiple trail connections throughout the parcel and offers public access to the existing wetland. This development exceeds City Code requirements for the provision of pedestrian walkways and active and passive green space. Preservation of Natural Amenities and Scenic Qualities The proposed development is planning to preserve 63% of the existing tree cover. The wetland is buffered, as required by City Code and amenities are proposed such as picnic areas and gazeboes overlooking the wetland. The scenic qualities of the wetland and park area will be emphasized by the wetland buffer. Recommendation: Based on analysis of the criteria for rezoning to Planned Unit Development, staff recommends approval of the rezoning to PUD for the plat, as revised to reflect the comments in the City Staff Review Letter, revised August 4, 2006. The Planning Commission recommends denial of the rezoning, based on the proposed findings included in your packet. The negative findings are: that the proposed development, as revised, is not compatible with surrounding land uses; that the proposed development will impose undue