My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:47:52 PM
Creation date
8/4/2006 2:22:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/08/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
435
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition to the assessed portions of these projects there are a costs which would need to be <br />funded by the sewer and water trunk funds for extending the utilities to the project limits and <br />looping the watermain to provide a second source in the event. Two options for watermain <br />looping are available: <br />■ Option A• with a loop through 157 Lane: Total project cost of approximately $3.2 <br />million; $1.5 million would be assessed; City cost of $1.6 million for the extension from <br />149 up to 157 and the looping. <br />• Option B with 157 Lane as a stand -alone project: Total project cost approximately $2.4 <br />million; $1 5 million would be assessed; City cost is reduced to approximately $930,000 <br />due to the looping costs being reduced. <br />• Ramsey Boulevard as a stand -alone project: Total project cost approximately $1.6 <br />million; approximately $1.3 million in potential assessments; City cost of approximately <br />$250,000. <br />Mr. Martini advised there is a potential for savings if the 157 Lane and Ramsey Boulevard <br />projects are combined with approximately $350,000 of the watermain extension that could <br />potentially be assessed. This would reduce the costs in the 157 Lane scenario if both projects <br />were to proceed. <br />Discussion with the petitioning residents suggested that the petitioners were anticipating future <br />subdivision of their properties, however they were also interested in discussing which elements <br />of the improvements were necessary at this time and which might be deferred to a later date. <br />relating to which elements. In particular it was questioned whether sidewalk improvements <br />should be installed at this time. <br />Recommendation: It was the recommendation of the Public Work Committee to have this topic <br />reviewed by the City Council at a future work session. <br />Action: <br />Ratify the recommendation of the Public Works Committee. <br />Case #2 Consider Turnback of CR 64 by Anoka County <br />Background: <br />Staff explained at the present time this roadway is in poor condition with two 10 -foot travel lanes <br />and no shoulders. Prior to turnback to the City the roadway could be reconstructed with two 12 <br />foot travel lanes and four foot paved shoulders along with 12 foot turn and bypass lanes at <br />Armstrong Boulevard, Variolite Street and Nowthen Boulevard at an estimated cost of $1.25 <br />million. Staff advised the Committee that development pressures within this area may cause the <br />City to consider two other options, which were suggested by the County short of the cost of full <br />reconstruction. The first alternative would be to reclaim the existing bituminous and repave with <br />12 -foot lanes. In addition this alternative would include mucking out the widening required along <br />the wetlands located on the east and west ends of the project. This alternative would reduce the <br />cost of the project to $800,000. A second alternative would consist of a simple overlay and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.