My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/22/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 08/22/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:48:49 PM
Creation date
8/18/2006 2:05:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/22/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-184– <br />Commissioner Trites Rolle stated she liked the idea of moving it, but the left turn did pose <br />problems. She noted since West Ramsey Parkway was split, could people head down the new <br />road and come into the bank as a one -way entry only, which would bring them straight thru the <br />drive -thru only. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated they could make a recommendation on what they had before <br />them. <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if they felt the way the layout of the site was so deficient with respect to <br />the location of the drive thru that it made sense for them to say they met the setback requirement <br />by reconfiguring this site and spinning it in the manner that would not need the variance and put <br />the drive thru on the east side. He stated if that was where they were at then they needed to move <br />in that direction. <br />There v er up,c names b .t ie Commrssi o nes <br />Rob stated they did show some sections of fence along Armstrong and they were not <br />ending fence because ____ _r:a L,.:....' ., 1..a,- ..,o.. He asked for some Cl:1TT 1�'Y-.atlnn <br />recomn } <br />on this. <br />Associate Planner <br />Commissioner`' Scoy as kedAf"it was necessary to ave th drive -thru Conti uous to th bank. <br />He asked if it c e i u l d , b e set apa pp theta <br />Rob 'responded physically it was possible, but there would still be some function issued with <br />respect to traffic flow. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated if they could do this reversing the traffic flow would be a non- <br />issue. He noted if they put the drive -thru on the east parking lot, they could put more parking <br />along their building. <br />Rob — replied there would be issues of security and they were not generally looked upon as <br />favorable for a financial institution. <br />Chairperson Nixt stated this was theoretically possible, but was it an improvement over what <br />they were looking at. <br />Commissioner Cleveland stated they needed to maintain the integrity of the town plan, but she <br />realized this was on a busy intersection. She stated with this being a multi -story building made <br />this an urban feel and a bank was a good thing to have in the community and she did not think <br />they would find something that would abut on a sidewalk because it would not look right. " She <br />believed they needed to keep this as urban feeling as they could. <br />Planning Commission /August 3, 2006 <br />Page 9 of 19 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.