My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/22/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 08/22/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:48:49 PM
Creation date
8/18/2006 2:05:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/22/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Commissioner Cleveland stated the only concern she could see was their customer running over <br />another customer. <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he did not see this as that problematic that they should rethink it. <br />Commissioner Trites Rolle stated she had not considered the quick left turn as being an issue, but <br />now she realized it was and would support where the drive thru was being proposed. <br />Chairperson Nixt stated the only option was to flip the drive thru on the south side and move the <br />building north, but he would rather have a drive -thru that was properly maintained and <br />landscaped than just a parking lot. <br />Commissioner Cleveland stated she believed it would be better to leave the drive thru where it <br />was. <br />Chairperso X st4t <br />shelter the drive area.. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated they would not see that because all you would see is a bark that <br />was 80 feet front-the wit h< ii. tarand a small rm. <br />Commissioner <br />he belied if <br />they hato w <br />attractive plan <br />they eeded .to bed the „northwest c.orne _- and taper i the,hemi.down to <br />aid out and believed it <br />:affic Problem. <br />aomplrskhe saw this <br />gild function and <br />ated wi i what <br />functional and <br />Commiioner Brauer stated this was really atwo- function building, a bank and an rfice <br />buildm and a lot of considerations they had in terms of the design and to make it economically <br />feasible :the needed° o e space <br />Mr. McDonald disagreed. He stated it was more of a requirement of the City. As far as <br />circulation, the circulation would not change whether it was a single story or a multi -story <br />building. <br />Commissioner Brauer noted the issue was with an office building, they needed parking spaces. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated this got down to the TC -2 district conflict. <br />Chairperson Nixt stated they were providing a recommendation and without seeing a site plan <br />showing the drive thru, parking and egress, he could only visualize this and from a left turn <br />standpoint this was too tight and would make it too difficult to exit there and therefore he was <br />leaning against staff' s recommendation to move the drive -thru to the east. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated as they were discussing alternative they could look at, but they <br />were not making this one of the recommendations. <br />Planning Commission /August 3, 2006 <br />Page 8 of 19 <br />-183— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.