My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1994 Working Papers
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1990-1999
>
1993 (Incompleted)
>
1994 Working Papers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2006 8:26:57 AM
Creation date
9/14/2006 8:22:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />businesses along the highway. North of the business areas is designated Industrial as far as the <br />landfill area. Much of the landfill area is designated Open Space. The northern part of the <br />landfill area is designated Park. <br /> <br />Like the No Bridge scenario, land along the river is designated Single Family Residential. <br />Areas along the south side ofHwy. 10 are proposed for more intense uses. The area from <br />Ramsey Blvd. to Sunfish Lake Blvd. provides for High or Medium Density Residential. <br />Likewise, the area on the highway west of Armstrong Blvd. is designated High Density <br />Residential. Between Ramsey and Armstrong is the Commercial area that provides the new <br />residential and commercial areas with retail services. A frontage/access road runs along the <br />south side ofHwy. 10, providing access to these areas. This eliminates the need for direct <br />access on and off the highway and reduces highway congestion. <br /> <br />Figure 7: Western Bridge Alignment, Alternative #2 <br /> <br />Like Alternative # 1, the Mississippi River bridge would be constructed directly south of Puma <br />St. However, the bridge road would terminate at CR 116, the east-west collector. Tra:ffic <br />from the bridge would be directed onto Hwy. 10, via a diamond interchange, or pass over the <br />highway for access to the residential, commercial, and industrial uses along CR 116, which acts <br />as the divider between residential and non-residential land uses. The north side is designated <br />Medium and High Density Residential. Single Family Residential stretches north of these <br />areas. <br /> <br />Land uses east of Armstrong Blvd. and north ofHwy. 10 differ somewhat from <br />Alternative # 1. The business park area at Ramsey Blvd.. becomes a Community <br />Commercial area. West of Armstrong, the extension ofCR 116 to Puma St. necessitates <br />different land uses near the connection with the bridge road. It is not an appropriate area <br />for single family residential uses. Office uses are proposed to take advantage of the high <br />visibility of the area from the bridge road. Armstrong Blvd. is shown connecting with <br />Hwy. 10, as it does presently. <br /> <br />South ofHwy. 10, land uses that differ from Alternative # 1 are shown. Community <br />Commercial (retail) is shown along the highway as well as residential areas. Office <br />Showroom uses are shown west of the bridge road, again to take advantage of the high <br />visibility of the location and location at the interchange of two major traffic routes. The <br />access road here is moved away from the highway. This allows for a larger area for larger <br />commercial developments. This road and the residential collector are shown passing <br />under the bridge road. Single Family Residential is shown for the remainder of the area <br />south ofHwy. 10. <br /> <br />The two western bridge alternatives pose difficulties along Hwy. 10. Alternative #1 <br />shows the bridge road becoming CR 116. Because of the close proximity ofHwy. 10 and <br />CR 116, Armstrong Blvd. ends at CR 116 and does not meet Hwy. 10. This would <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />L3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.