1995 Approved - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D. What is the official local statu $ of the plan .amendment? (Check one or more as appropriate) .. . X Acted upon by planning commission (if applicable) on November 4. 1994 X Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review. Considered, but not approved, by governing body on Other E. Indicate what adjacent local governmental units affected by the change have been sent copies of the plan amendment and the date(s) copies were sent to them. Notification of affected adjacent governmental units is required for major plan amendments. City of Anoka. City of Andover. City of Elk River. City of Dayton. Anoka County and Burns Township. Because of,the comprehensive nature of most major plan amendments, a summary checklist is attached to help ensure that the amendment is complete for Council review and to determine whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the metropolitan systems plans or other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide. Please indicate whether the amendment affects the following factors. Where it does, the materials submitted must fully address the issue(s). II . IMPACT ON REGIONAL SYSTEMS A Wastewater Treatment 1 . Change in city's year 2000/2010 flow projections. No/Not Applicable X Yes, What will be the net change? How were these calculated? The minor plan amendment approved in 1992 proiected a flow of 1.024 mod for the year 2000 compared to 0.987. See section IX for calculations. 2. Community discharges to more than one metropolitan interceptor. X No/Not Applicable Yes, Indicate which interceptor will be affected by the amendment and what will be the net changes in flow B. Transportation 1 . Relationship to Council policies regarding metropolitan highways. No/Not Applicable X Yes, Data provided as requested relative to impact on metro highway system. i i