Laserfiche WebLink
<br />H/t1.d <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Mr. Carl Ohm <br />Mr. Jon Olson <br />July 1, 1994 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />Results and Conclusions <br /> <br />The PM design hour volume level of service (LOS) analysis, as shown in Table <br />2 reveals the following: <br /> <br />1) Year 1990 existing conditions are primarily at LOS D, with TH 10/47 at <br />LOS E. In a growing metropolitan area, LOS D is an acceptable level of <br />operation. <br /> <br />2) Year 2015 forecast LOS for both scenarios and roadway improvements <br />show that five screenline locations are operating at LOS E and that four <br />screenline locations are operating at LOS F. 'This condition will exist <br />regardless of the MUSA expansion. <br /> <br />3) There is one screen1ine location where the LOS decreases from a C to a D <br />from the 2015 Base Case to 2015 Expanded MUSA. However, as stated <br />above, in a growing metropolitan area LOS D is considered an acceptable <br />level of operation. <br /> <br />4) With capacity enhancements to the affected roadways, along with TOM <br />strategies, level of service can be improved to acceptable operational <br />levels. <br /> <br />cc: Dave Carlberg, City of Andover <br />Jim Gromberg, City of Ramsey <br /> <br />28:11 v6, 01 ~n~ <br />