Laserfiche WebLink
<br />board/commission membership, unless it is in an ex-officio capacity or there is insufficient <br />public interest in serving. Implementation of the policy would occur by dual membership <br />persons selecting the board/commission of their choice as their respective terms expire. <br />This policy should be forwarded to boards and commission for input and returned to <br />Council in resolution form for adoption. <br /> <br />Case #8: <br /> <br />Adopt Ordinance To Rezone Property North Of Highway #10 <br />And East Of Armstrong Blvd. N.W. From 1-1 Industrial To B- <br />1 Business; Case Of Mr. Thomas Kurak: <br /> <br />The Council introduced an ordinance on June 27, 1989 to rezone property north of Hwy. <br />#10 to B-1 Business. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cich and seconded by Councilmember DeLuca to adopt <br />Ordinance #89-14 rezoning property north of Hwy. #10 N.W. and east of Armstrong <br />Blvd. N.W. from I-I Industrial to B-1 Business. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, Cich <br />and Peterson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #9: <br /> <br />Discuss The Need For Amusement Center Regulations: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember DeLuca and seconded by Councilmember Cich authorizing the <br />City Attorney to seek the Attorney General's opinion regarding whether or not land use <br />zoning regulations are subject to public referendums. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Mr. Hartley noted that he has informed Metro Council that Ramsey <br />disagrees with the 4 in 40 policy but recognizes it and intends to comply; Ramsey has also <br />requested the opportunity to participate in the changing of that policy and Metro Council <br /> <br />City CounciVJuly 11, 1989 <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />