My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MUSA Expansion Requests
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
MUSA Expansion Requests
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2021 8:57:07 AM
Creation date
9/14/2006 2:47:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AUG- 30 - '90 THU 13:36 ID:METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TEL N : 2 <br />4. The proposed plan map(s) indicating area(s) affected, if the amendment <br />triggers a map change. <br />Wha* the official local status of the plan amendment? (Cheek one or more as <br />appropriate.) <br />by planning applicable) <br />X Acted upon b tannin commission (if app ) an <br />X Approved by governing body: contingent upon Metropolitan Council review, <br />____911±....t.0 sug 1emental -ndu-1 <br />9/10/90 governing body on <br />Considered, but not approved, by g g <br />Other <br />Indicate what adjacent local governmental units affected by the change have been <br />Sent copies of the plan amendment and m ental units is required sent to them. plan <br />Notiiicatioa of affected adjacent govt cm; ttPa r plan <br />amendtnemts. Co i es o r i • <br />cities of Anoka Andover Cham'l <br />Copies of the amendment transmitt <br />Because of the comprehensive nature of most major plan amendments d h e e t erm s t is <br />m <br />attached to help ensure that the aendtneat is complete for Council <br />whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the metropolitan systems plans or other <br />chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide. Please indicate whether the amendment <br />affects the following fawn. Where it does, the materials submitted must fully address the <br />issue(:). <br />II. IMPACT ON R)GIONAL SYSTEMS <br />A. Wastewater 'treatment <br />1. Change in city's year 2000/2010 flow projections. <br />No/Not Applicable. <br />X Y What will be the net change? How were these calculated? <br />Se i - <br />projection data included in amendment. <br />Community discharges to more than one metropolitan interceptor. <br />No/Not Applicable. <br />X , Yes. Indicate which interceptor will be affected by the amendment <br />and what will be the net changes in flows? <br />E <br />xistin flow is t two in -r <br />no a WWTP. Uson 'lant •hase -out all fl <br />B interceptor. <br />eC <br />vii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.